Terrestrial Structure from Motion Photogrammetry for Deriving Forest Inventory Data

The measurements of tree attributes required for forest monitoring and management planning, e.g., National Forest Inventories, are derived by rather time-consuming field measurements on sample plots, using calipers and measurement tapes. Therefore, forest managers and researchers are looking for alternative methods. Currently, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is the remote sensing method that provides the most accurate point clouds at the plot-level to derive these attributes from. However, the demand for even more efficient and effective solutions triggers further developments to lower the acquisition time, costs, and the expertise needed to acquire and process 3D point clouds, while maintaining the quality of extracted tree parameters. In this context, photogrammetry is considered a potential solution. Despite a variety of studies, much uncertainty still exists about the quality of photogrammetry-based methods for deriving plot-level forest attributes in natural forests. Therefore, the overall goal of this study is to evaluate the competitiveness of terrestrial photogrammetry based on structure from motion (SfM) and dense image matching for deriving tree positions, diameters at breast height (DBHs), and stem curves of forest plots by means of a consumer grade camera. We define an image capture method and we assess the accuracy of the photogrammetric results on four forest plots located in Austria and Slovakia, two in each country, selected to cover a wide range of conditions such as terrain slope, undergrowth vegetation, and tree density, age, and species. For each forest plot, the reference data of the forest parameters were obtained by conducting field surveys and TLS measurements almost simultaneously with the photogrammetric acquisitions. The TLS data were also used to estimate the accuracy of the photogrammetric ground height, which is a necessary product to derive DBHs and tree heights. For each plot, we automatically derived tree counts, tree positions, DBHs, and part of the stem curve from both TLS and SfM using a software developed at TU Wien (Forest Analysis and Inventory Tool, FAIT), and the results were compared. The images were oriented with errors of a few millimetres only, according to checkpoint residuals. The automatic tree detection rate for the SfM reconstruction ranges between 65% and 98%, where the missing trees have average DBHs of less than 12 cm. For each plot, the mean error of SfM and TLS DBH estimates is −1.13 cm and −0.77 cm with respect to the caliper measurements. The resulting stem curves show that the mean differences between SfM and TLS stem diameters is at maximum −2.45 cm up to 3 m above ground, which increases to almost +4 cm for higher elevations. This study shows that with the adopted image capture method, terrestrial SfM photogrammetry, is an accurate solution to support forest inventory for estimating the number of trees and their location, the DBHs and stem curve up to 3 m above ground. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 950; doi:10.3390/rs11080950 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 950 2 of 23

[1]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  The Use of a Hand-Held Camera for Individual Tree 3D Mapping in Forest Sample Plots , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Christopher Gomez,et al.  3D modelling of individual trees using a handheld camera: Accuracy of height, diameter and volume estimates , 2015 .

[3]  S. Lane,et al.  Structure from motion (SFM) photogrammetry , 2015 .

[4]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review , 2016 .

[5]  Xinlian Liang,et al.  In-situ measurements from mobile platforms: An emerging approach to address the old challenges associated with forest inventories , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[6]  M. Herold,et al.  Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[7]  Sébastien Bauwens,et al.  Forest Inventory with Terrestrial LiDAR: A Comparison of Static and Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning , 2016 .

[8]  Jordan Miller Estimation of individual tree metrics using structure-from-motion photogrammetry. , 2015 .

[9]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimating single-tree branch biomass of Norway spruce with terrestrial laser scanning using voxel-based and crown dimension features , 2013 .

[10]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[11]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Feasibility of Google Tango and Kinect for Crowdsourcing Forestry Information , 2017 .

[12]  Sébastien Bauwens,et al.  Terrestrial photogrammetry: a non‐destructive method for modelling irregularly shaped tropical tree trunks , 2017 .

[13]  J. Liski,et al.  Tree Root System Characterization and Volume Estimation by Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Quantitative Structure Modeling , 2014 .

[14]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  A Backpack-Mounted Omnidirectional Camera with Off-the-Shelf Navigation Sensors for Mobile Terrestrial Mapping: Development and Forest Application , 2018, Sensors.

[15]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Forest inventories by LiDAR data: A comparison of single tree segmentation and metric-based methods for inventories of a heterogeneous temperate forest , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[16]  Fumiki Hosoi,et al.  Estimation of tree structure parameters from video frames with removal of blurred images using machine learning , 2018 .

[17]  Emily Williams,et al.  Assessing Handheld Mobile Laser Scanners for Forest Surveys , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[18]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[19]  Yizong Cheng,et al.  Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Abdul Mannan,et al.  Extraction of Sample Plot Parameters from 3D Point Cloud Reconstruction Based on Combined RTK and CCD Continuous Photography , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Alberto Guarnieri,et al.  Use of terrestrial photogrammetry based on structure‐from‐motion for mass balance estimation of a small glacier in the Italian alps , 2015 .

[22]  Di Wang,et al.  Automatic and Self-Adaptive Stem Reconstruction in Landslide-Affected Forests , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[23]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[24]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Stem biomass estimation based on stem reconstruction from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds , 2013 .

[25]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Tree Stem Shapes Derived from TLS Data as an Indicator for Shallow Landslides , 2016 .

[26]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Individual tree biomass estimation using terrestrial laser scanning , 2013 .

[27]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Tree Stem Diameter Estimation from Mobile Laser Scanning Using Line-Wise Intensity-Based Clustering , 2016 .

[28]  Albert I. J. M. van Dijk,et al.  Deriving comprehensive forest structure information from mobile laser scanning observations using automated point cloud classification , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Justin Morgenroth,et al.  Assessment of tree structure using a 3D image analysis technique—A proof of concept , 2014 .

[30]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Forest Data Collection Using Terrestrial Image-Based Point Clouds From a Handheld Camera Compared to Terrestrial and Personal Laser Scanning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  OPALS - A framework for Airborne Laser Scanning data analysis , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[32]  P. Surový,et al.  Forest Stand Inventory Based on Combined Aerial and Terrestrial Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2016 .

[33]  M. Herold,et al.  Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots , 2017 .

[34]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Automatic Estimation of Tree Position and Stem Diameter Using a Moving Terrestrial Laser Scanner , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[35]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Separating Tree Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Components from Point Cloud Data Using Dynamic Segment Merging , 2018 .

[36]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  QUALITY ANALYSIS AND CORRECTION OF MOBILE BACKPACK LASER SCANNING DATA , 2016 .

[37]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[38]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Photogrammetric measurement of tree stems from vertical fisheye images , 2017 .

[39]  Silvia Santini,et al.  An annually-resolved stem growth tool based on 3D laser scans and 2D tree-ring data , 2018, Trees.

[40]  Chongcheng Chen,et al.  Three‐dimensional digitization of the arid land plant Haloxylon ammodendron using a consumer‐grade camera , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[41]  Xinlian Liang,et al.  Evaluation of Close-Range Photogrammetry Image Collection Methods for Estimating Tree Diameters , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[42]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[43]  Julián Tomaštík,et al.  High Precision Individual Tree Diameter and Perimeter Estimation from Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2018, Forests.

[44]  Peter Surový,et al.  Accuracy of Structure from Motion models in comparison with terrestrial laser scanner for the analysis of DBH and height influence on error behaviour. , 2016 .

[45]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[46]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automated Stem Curve Measurement Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  J. Eitel,et al.  A lightweight, low cost autonomously operating terrestrial laser scanner for quantifying and monitoring ecosystem structural dynamics , 2013 .

[48]  Milan Koreň,et al.  Estimation of diameter at breast height from mobile laser scanning data collected under a heavy forest canopy , 2017 .

[49]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  Estimation of Tree Stem Attributes Using Terrestrial Photogrammetry with a Camera Rig , 2016 .

[50]  Y. Tseng,et al.  Bundle adjustment of spherical images acquired with a portable panoramic image mapping system (PPIMS) , 2016 .

[51]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  LiDAR Data Filtering and DTM Generation , 2017 .

[52]  J. Kershaw,et al.  Spatial Tree Mapping Using Photography. , 2010 .

[53]  Peter Surový,et al.  Accuracy of Reconstruction of the Tree Stem Surface Using Terrestrial Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..