Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT

The combination/fusion of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT) depends to a great extend on the co-registration of X-ray angiography (XA) and IVUS/OCT. In this work a new and robust three-dimensional (3D) segmentation and registration approach is presented and validated. The approach starts with standard QCA of the vessel of interest in the two angiographic views (either biplane or two monoplane views). Next, the vessel of interest is reconstructed in 3D and registered with the corresponding IVUS/OCT pullback series by a distance mapping algorithm. The accuracy of the registration was retrospectively evaluated on 12 silicone phantoms with coronary stents implanted, and on 24 patients who underwent both coronary angiography and IVUS examinations of the left anterior descending artery. Stent borders or sidebranches were used as markers for the validation. While the most proximal marker was set as the baseline position for the distance mapping algorithm, the subsequent markers were used to evaluate the registration error. The correlation between the registration error and the distance from the evaluated marker to the baseline position was analyzed. The XA-IVUS registration error for the 12 phantoms was 0.03 ± 0.32 mm (P = 0.75). One OCT pullback series was excluded from the phantom study, since it did not cover the distal stent border. The XA-OCT registration error for the remaining 11 phantoms was 0.05 ± 0.25 mm (P = 0.49). For the in vivo validation, two patients were excluded due to insufficient image quality for the analysis. In total 78 sidebranches were identified from the remaining 22 patients and the registration error was evaluated on 56 markers. The registration error was 0.03 ± 0.45 mm (P = 0.67). The error was not correlated to the distance between the evaluated marker and the baseline position (P = 0.73). In conclusion, the new XA-IVUS/OCT co-registration approach is a straightforward and reliable solution to combine X-ray angiography and IVUS/OCT imaging for the assessment of the extent of coronary artery disease. It provides the interventional cardiologist with detailed information about vessel size and plaque size at every position along the vessel of interest, making this a suitable tool during the actual intervention.

[1]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[2]  K. Sadamatsu,et al.  Three-dimensional coronary imaging for the ostium of the left anterior descending artery , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  Theodore A Bass,et al.  Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Reiber,et al.  Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer™ marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: An in vitro and in vivo study , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Plaque development, vessel curvature, and wall shear stress in coronary arteries assessed by X-ray angiography and intravascular ultrasound , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  S. Pocock,et al.  Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[9]  C. Zarins,et al.  Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[11]  G. Stone,et al.  The accuracy of length measurements using different intravascular ultrasound motorized transducer pullback systems , 2007, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  K. Hirata,et al.  Factors that influence measurements and accurate evaluation of stent apposition by optical coherence tomography. Assessment using a phantom model. , 2009, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[13]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid stent design in the acute phase: a comparison between 2- and 3D-QCA, QCU and QMSCT-CA. , 2008, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  Raghava R. Gollapudi,et al.  CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Original Studies Utility of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Coronary Angiography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2007 .

[16]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Coronary angiography enhancement for visualization , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[17]  Andreas Wahle,et al.  Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  In vivo validation of CAAS QCA‐3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS) , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[19]  Stéphane G Carlier,et al.  Clinical researchInterventional cardiologyStent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study , 2005 .

[20]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  A novel three‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In‐vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[21]  Gerhard Koning,et al.  A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: Comparison with current conventional methods , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  P. Serruys,et al.  True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  John D. Carroll,et al.  Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  J. Messenger,et al.  Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: A three‐dimensional analysis of physician‐determined vs. computer‐generated views , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[26]  P. Radeva,et al.  Corresponding IVUS and angiogram image data , 2001, Computers in Cardiology 2001. Vol.28 (Cat. No.01CH37287).

[27]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  A.C.M. Dumay,et al.  Image reconstruction from biplane angiographic projections , 1992 .

[29]  J. Reiber,et al.  A New Approach to Contour Detection in X-Ray Arteriograms: The Wavecontour , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[30]  C von Birgelen,et al.  ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound analysis: implications for volumetric measurements. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.