From pots to plots: hierarchical trait‐based prediction of plant performance in a mesic grassland

Traits are powerful predictors of ecosystem functions pointing to underlying physiological and ecological processes. Plant individual performance results from the coordinated operation of many processes, ranging from nutrient uptake over organ turnover to photosynthesis, thus requiring a large set of traits for its prediction. For plant performance on higher hierarchical levels, e.g. populations, additional traits important for plant‐plant and trophic interactions may be required which should even enlarge the spectrum of relevant predictor traits. The goal of this study was to assess the importance of plant functional traits to predict individual and population performance of grassland species with particular focus on the significance of root traits. We tested this for 59 grassland species using 35 traits divided into three trait clusters: leaf traits (16), stature traits (8) and root traits (11), using individual biomass of mesocosm plants as a measure of individual performance and population biomass of monocultures as a measure of population performance. We applied structural equation models to disentangle direct effects of single traits on population biomass and indirect effects via individual plant biomass or shoot density.We tested multivariate trait effects on individual and population biomass to analyse whether the importance of different trait clusters shifts with increasing hierarchical integration from individuals to populations. Traits of all three clusters significantly correlated with individual and population biomass. However, in spite of a number of significant correlations, above‐below‐ground linkages were generally weak, with few exceptions like N content. Stature traits exclusively affected population biomass indirectly via their effect on individual biomass, whereas root and leaf traits showed also direct effects and partly indirect effects via density. The inclusion of root traits in multiple regression models improved the prediction of individual biomass when compared with models with only above‐ground information only slightly (95% vs. 93% of variance prediction with and without root traits, respectively) but was crucial for the prediction of population biomass (77% and 49%, respectively). Root traits were more important for plant performance than leaf traits and were even the most important predictors at the population level Synthesis. Upscaling from the individual to the population level reflects an increasing number of processes requiring traits from different trait clusters for their prediction. Our results emphasize the importance of root traits for trait‐based studies especially at higher organizational levels. Our approach provides a comprehensive framework acknowledging the hierarchical nature of trait influences. This is one step towards a more process‐oriented assessment of trait‐based approaches.

[1]  Ute Dreher,et al.  Evolution In Changing Environments Some Theoretical Explorations , 2016 .

[2]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  L. Mommer,et al.  Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  P. Reich The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto , 2014 .

[5]  Yu Dai,et al.  [Effects and influence factors of dicyandiamide (DCD) application in agricultural ecosystem]. , 1988, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  P. Lemanceau,et al.  Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[8]  D. Hertel,et al.  Intraspecific variation in root and leaf traits and leaf-root trait linkages in eight aspen demes (Populus tremula and P. tremuloides) , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[9]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Are functional traits good predictors of species performance in restoration plantings in tropical abandoned pastures , 2013 .

[10]  Raphaël Martin,et al.  Plasticity of Plant Form and Function Sustains Productivity and Dominance along Environment and Comp , 2013 .

[11]  D. Wardle,et al.  Plasticity in above- and belowground resource acquisition traits in response to single and multiple environmental factors in three tree species , 2013, Ecology and Evolution.

[12]  M. Walters,et al.  Intraspecific growth and functional leaf trait responses to natural soil resource gradients for conifer species with contrasting leaf habit. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[13]  Jian-Kang Zhu,et al.  Rapid phosphatidic acid accumulation in response to low temperature stress in Arabidopsis is generated through diacylglycerol kinase , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[14]  Michael Bahn,et al.  Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services , 2013 .

[15]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Predicting invertebrate herbivory from plant traits: evidence from 51 grassland species in experimental monocultures. , 2012, Ecology.

[16]  Christian Wirth,et al.  Functional traits explain light and size response of growth rates in tropical tree species. , 2012, Ecology.

[17]  T. S. Adams,et al.  Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[18]  L. Mommer,et al.  The role of roots in the resource economics spectrum. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[19]  M. Navas,et al.  Quantifying trait selection driving community assembly: a test in herbaceous plant communities under contrasted land use regimes , 2012 .

[20]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[21]  Raphaël Martin,et al.  GEMINI: a Grassland Model Simulating the Role of Plant Traits for Community Dynamics and Ecosystem F , 2012 .

[22]  R. Aerts,et al.  Disturbance and resource availability act differently on the same suite of plant traits: revisiting assembly hypotheses. , 2012, Ecology.

[23]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability , 2012 .

[24]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services , 2012 .

[25]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[26]  Katja Poveda,et al.  Predicting root defence against herbivores during succession , 2011 .

[27]  O. Alizadeh,et al.  Mycorrhizal Symbiosis , 1986, Forest Science.

[28]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data , 2010 .

[29]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  A multi‐trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra‐ vs. interspecific variability in plant traits , 2010 .

[30]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Coordinated variation in leaf and root traits across multiple spatial scales in Chinese semi-arid and arid ecosystems. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[31]  J. Bever,et al.  Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Carolyn Hull Sieg,et al.  A multi‐trait test of the leaf‐height‐seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora , 2010 .

[33]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[34]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[35]  H. Ellenberg Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen : in ökologischer ,dynamischer und historischer Sicht , 2010 .

[36]  B. Shipley From Plant Traits to Vegetation Structure: Chance and Selection in the Assembly of Ecological Communities , 2009 .

[37]  Guillermo P Murphy,et al.  Kin recognition: Competition and cooperation in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). , 2009, American journal of botany.

[38]  A. Weigelt,et al.  Positive biodiversity–productivity relationship due to increased plant density , 2009 .

[39]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[40]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface , 2009, Plant and Soil.

[41]  N. V. Dam Belowground Herbivory and Plant Defenses , 2009 .

[42]  J. Vivanco,et al.  Regulation and function of root exudates. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[43]  Jos M. Raaijmakers,et al.  The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms , 2009, Plant and Soil.

[44]  P. Reich,et al.  Why are evergreen leaves so contrary about shade? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  E. Schulze,et al.  Species richness and identity affect the use of aboveground space in experimental grasslands , 2008 .

[46]  K. Mokany,et al.  Are traits measured on pot grown plants representative of those in natural communities , 2008 .

[47]  J. O H A N N E,et al.  Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants , 2008 .

[48]  E. Schulze,et al.  Detecting the role of individual species for overyielding in experimental grassland communities composed of potentially dominant species , 2007, Oecologia.

[49]  E. Schulze,et al.  Establishment of grassland species in monocultures: different strategies lead to success , 2007, Oecologia.

[50]  D. Ackerly,et al.  A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[51]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Factors influencing changes in trait correlations across species after using phylogenetic independent contrasts , 2006, Evolutionary Ecology.

[52]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta‐analysis , 2006 .

[53]  P. Reich,et al.  COMPARISONS OF STRUCTURE AND LIFE SPAN IN ROOTS AND LEAVES AMONG TEMPERATE TREES , 2006 .

[54]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. , 2006, Ecology.

[55]  Lawren Sack,et al.  How strong is intracanopy leaf plasticity in temperate deciduous trees? , 2006, American journal of botany.

[56]  J. Vivanco,et al.  The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. , 2006, Annual review of plant biology.

[57]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  S. Díaz,et al.  Suites of root traits differ between annual and perennial species growing in the field. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[59]  P. Reich,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. , 2006, Ecology.

[60]  P. Reich,et al.  Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[61]  P. Reich,et al.  Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[62]  Joseph M. Craine,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ON A GLOBAL RELATIONSHIP AMONG LEAF AND ROOT TRAITS OF GRASSES , 2005 .

[63]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[64]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[65]  P. Ryser,et al.  Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast- and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[66]  P. Reich,et al.  Relative growth rate in relation to physiological and morphological traits for northern hardwood tree seedlings: species, light environment and ontogenetic considerations , 1993, Oecologia.

[67]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate , 1990, Oecologia.

[68]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Physiological determinants of growth rate in response to phosphorus supply in wild and cultivated Hordeum species , 1989, Oecologia.

[69]  F. Chapin,et al.  Relationship of ion absorption to growth rate in taiga trees , 1986, Oecologia.

[70]  E. Schulze,et al.  The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: an experimental approach in a grassland community , 2004 .

[71]  S. Hubbell,et al.  GAP‐DEPENDENT RECRUITMENT, REALIZED VITAL RATES, AND SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF TROPICAL TREES , 2003 .

[72]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[73]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[74]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[75]  J. Craine,et al.  Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand , 2003, Oecologia.

[76]  Katharine N. Suding,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SPECIES TRAITS: SEPARATING LEVELS OF RESPONSE AND IDENTIFYING LINKAGES TO ABUNDANCE , 2003 .

[77]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[78]  J. Currey,et al.  The role of root system architecture and root hairs in promoting anchorage against uprooting forces in Allium cepa and root mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[79]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[80]  David Tilman,et al.  The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients , 2001 .

[81]  E. Gianoli,et al.  Plasticity of leaf traits and insect herbivory in Solanum incanum L. (Solanaceae) in Nguruman, SW Kenya , 2000 .

[82]  M. Roderick,et al.  Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology , 1999 .

[83]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients , 1999 .

[84]  Peter B. Reich,et al.  Leaf structure (specific leaf area) modulates photosynthesis–nitrogen relations: evidence from within and across species and functional groups , 1998 .

[85]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light , 1998 .

[86]  Peter Ryser,et al.  The importance of tissue density for growth and life span of leaves and roots: a comparison of five ecologically contrasting grasses , 1996 .

[87]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[88]  J. Rodman,et al.  INSECT HERBIVORY AS A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE SHADE DISTRIBUTION OF A NATIVE CRUCIFER (CARDAMINE CORDIFOLIA A. GRAY, BITTERCRESS) , 1996 .

[89]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction , 1995 .

[90]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[91]  D. Eissenstat,et al.  On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstocks , 1991 .

[92]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits , 1988, Nature.

[93]  James B. Grace The effects of plant age on the ability to predict mixture performance from monoculture growth , 1988 .

[94]  M. Austin,et al.  USE OF A RELATIVE PHYSIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE VALUE IN THE PREDICTION OF PERFORMANCE IN MULTISPECIES MIXTURES FROM MONOCULTURE PERFORMANCE , 1982 .

[95]  K. Barley The Configuration of the Root System in Relation to Nutrient Uptake , 1970 .

[96]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[97]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[98]  K. Yoda,et al.  Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI) , 1963 .

[99]  H. Gleason The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1926 .

[100]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[101]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .