Impact of orthogonal optical feedback on the polarization switching of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers

We study experimentally and numerically the influence of orthogonal optical feedback on the polarization-resolved light versus bias current characteristic (L-I curve) of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs). The feedback scheme is such that only one linear polarization is selected to be fed back into the laser while the orthogonal polarization is completely suppressed before the output is rotated 90° and reinjected into the laser. We experimentally demonstrate that weak feedback levels modify the polarization switching point only slightly, but as the feedback increases the otherwise depressed mode grows and the hysteresis is suppressed. While polarization-preserved and X-orthogonal feedback have similar effects (X indicates the direction of the polarization selected at threshold), Y-orthogonal feedback strongly modifies the shape of the L-I curve, even suppressing the polarization-switching for strong enough feedback. Numerical simulations of the spin-flip model show good qualitative agreement with the observations. We also analyze the influence of various parameters, such as linear birefringence, dichroism, and the spin-flip relaxation rate.

[1]  H. Thienpont,et al.  Optical feedback induces polarization mode hopping in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 2002, The 15th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society.

[2]  K. Shore,et al.  Experimental demonstration of VCSEL-based chaotic optical communications , 2004, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[3]  Mario Dagenais,et al.  High‐frequency polarization self‐modulation in vertical‐cavity surface‐emitting lasers , 1993 .

[4]  Athanasios Gavrielides,et al.  Identity synchronization in diode lasers with unidirectional feedback and injection of rotated optical fields , 2006 .

[5]  Ryoji Ohba,et al.  Practical Accurate Optical Ranging Based on Polarization Self Modulation of a Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser Diode , 2003 .

[6]  Thomas Erneux,et al.  Square-wave self-modulation in diode lasers with polarization-rotated optical feedback. , 2006, Optics letters.

[7]  A. Valle,et al.  Polarization selection and sensitivity of external cavity vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser diodes , 1998, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[8]  Mario Dagenais,et al.  Optical injection induced polarization bistability in vertical‐cavity surface‐emitting lasers , 1993 .

[9]  K. Kasahara,et al.  Polarization-controlled single-mode VCSEL , 1998 .

[10]  K. Shore,et al.  Suppression of polarization switching in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers by use of optical feedback. , 2004, Optics letters.

[11]  H. Thienpont,et al.  Effect of photon-energy-dependent loss and gain mechanisms on polarization switching in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 1999 .

[12]  Thorsten Ackemann,et al.  Characteristics of polarization switching from the low to the high frequency mode in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 2001 .

[13]  Neal B. Abraham,et al.  Polarization properties of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 1997 .

[14]  Wei Pan,et al.  Polarization dynamics of vertical-cavity surface- emitting lasers with optical feedback , 2006 .

[15]  Patrice Mégret,et al.  Bifurcation bridges between external-cavity modes lead to polarization self-modulation in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 2002 .

[16]  Pascal Besnard,et al.  Switching between polarized modes of a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser by isotropic optical feedback , 1999 .

[17]  Yanhua Hong,et al.  Synchronization of chaos in unidirectionally coupled vertical-cavity surface-emitting semiconductor lasers. , 2004, Optics letters.

[18]  M San Miguel,et al.  Mechanisms of polarization switching in single-transverse-mode vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers: thermal shift and nonlinear semiconductor dynamics. , 1999, Optics letters.

[19]  Rajarshi Roy,et al.  Communication with dynamically fluctuating states of light polarization. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[20]  S. Balle,et al.  Passive mode-locking of lasers by crossed-polarization gain modulation , 2007, 2007 European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and the International Quantum Electronics Conference.

[21]  Thomas D Milster,et al.  Polarization switching control in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 1997 .

[22]  K. Shore,et al.  Experimental study of polarization switching of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers as a dynamical bifurcation. , 2005, Optics letters.

[23]  Kent D. Choquette,et al.  Stable polarization self-modulation in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 1998 .

[24]  Kent D. Choquette,et al.  Gain-dependent polarization properties of vertical-cavity lasers , 1995 .

[25]  Jan Danckaert,et al.  Polarization message encoding through vectorial chaos synchronization in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[26]  P.S. Spencer,et al.  Dynamic regimes in semiconductor lasers subject to incoherent optical feedback , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[27]  K. Shore,et al.  Polarization behavior of birefringent multitransverse mode vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers , 1997, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[28]  M Sciamanna,et al.  Bifurcation to polarization self-modulation in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers: errata. , 2002, Optics letters.