Reliable protein structure refinement using a physical energy function

In the past decade, significant progress has been made in protein structure prediction. However, refining models to a level of resolution that is comparable with experimental results and can be used in studies like enzymatic activity still remains a major challenge. We have previously demonstrated that our modular protein–solvent energy function, uniquely involving a potential of mean force description for hydrophobic solvation, works well in protein globular structure prediction and loop modeling. In this work, we couple protein–solvent energy function with our global optimization method stochastic perturbation with soft constraints and use them to refine a collection of template models from submitted predictions to recent Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction blind prediction contests. A prediction protocol based on a selection of structures with the lowest energy is able to successfully refine all of the test proteins, and, more importantly, our energy function does not show degradation in prediction when sampling is exhausted. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2011

[1]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction—Round VII , 2007, Proteins.

[2]  Teresa Head-Gordon,et al.  Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction. , 2007, Structure.

[3]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[4]  A. Roitberg,et al.  All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[6]  Brett W. Bader,et al.  A physical approach to protein structure prediction. , 2002, Biophysical Journal.

[7]  Liliana Wroblewska,et al.  Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. Levitt,et al.  A novel approach to decoy set generation: designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Teresa Head-Gordon,et al.  Improved Energy Selection of Nativelike Protein Loops from Loop Decoys. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[11]  P. Bradley,et al.  Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins , 2005, Science.

[12]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[13]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  David E. Kim,et al.  Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Michael Feig,et al.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[16]  Liliana Wroblewska,et al.  Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[20]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[21]  Hao Fan,et al.  Refinement of homology‐based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  Randy J Read,et al.  Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template‐based modeling category , 2007, Proteins.

[23]  D. Baker,et al.  2.1 and 1.8 Å Average Cα RMSD Structure Predictions on Two Small Proteins, HP-36 and S15 , 2001 .

[24]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality , 2004, Proteins.

[25]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA , 1999, Proteins.

[26]  Lars Malmström,et al.  Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive all‐atom refinement with Rosetta@home , 2007, Proteins.

[27]  Daniel Fischer,et al.  3D‐SHOTGUN: A novel, cooperative, fold‐recognition meta‐predictor , 2003, Proteins.

[28]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[29]  A. Sali,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.

[30]  J Lundström,et al.  Pcons: A neural‐network–based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  Jianhan Chen,et al.  Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high‐resolution refinement of protein structure? , 2007, Proteins.

[32]  M. Levitt,et al.  Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Janusz M Bujnicki,et al.  Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold‐recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models , 2005, Proteins.

[34]  P. Kollman,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .

[35]  K. Misura,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 59:15–29 (2005) Progress and Challenges in High-Resolution Refinement of Protein Structure Models , 2022 .

[36]  Christopher M. Summa,et al.  Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Yang Zhang,et al.  The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  T. Head-Gordon,et al.  Minimalist models for protein folding and design. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.