Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire.

AIM To develop and test the psychometric characteristics of a questionnaire measuring attitudes toward plagiarism. METHODS Participants were 227 undergraduates and graduate students (128 women and 99 men) from three Croatian universities, with a median age of 21 years (range 18 to 48). Research was conducted from March to June 2009. For the purpose of construction of the first version of the questionnaire, 67 statements (items) were developed. The statements were based on the relevant literature and were developed following rules and recommendations for questionnaire writing, and 36 items were chosen for final validation. Factor analysis was used to find out the factor structure of the questionnaire and to measure construct validity. RESULTS The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 29 items divided into a three-factor structure: factor I - positive attitude toward plagiarism (12 items); factor II - negative attitude toward plagiarism (7 items); and factor III - subjective norms toward plagiarism (10 items). Cronbach alpha was calculated to confirm the reliability of the scale: factor I - alpha=0.83; factor II - alpha=0.79; and factor III - alpha=0.85. Correlations between factors were: -0.37 between I and II, -0.41 between I and III, and +0.31 between II and III. CONCLUSION Attitudes Toward Plagiarism questionnaire was developed, with good psychometric characteristics. It will be used in future research as a standardized tool for measuring attitudes toward plagiarism.

[1]  J. Leta,et al.  Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science , 2009, EMBO reports.

[2]  Sandra L. Titus,et al.  Repairing research integrity , 2008, Nature.

[3]  Lucas D. Introna,et al.  Plagiarism, values and computing: differing cultural expectations of academic work in information systems education , 2005 .

[4]  Mohan J. Dutta-Bergman Theory and Practice in Health Communication Campaigns: A Critical Interrogation , 2005, Health communication.

[5]  David J. Kosek,et al.  Ethics and scientific publication. , 2005, Advances in physiology education.

[6]  S. Rennie,et al.  Are “tomorrow's doctors” honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Scientists behaving badly , 2005, Nature.

[8]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  Belief Importance in Expectancy-Value Models of Attitudes , 1998 .

[9]  M. Elzubeir,et al.  Exploring perceptions and attitudes of senior medical students and interns to academic integrity , 2003, Medical education.

[10]  M. Petrovecki,et al.  Croatian Medical Journal introduces culture, control, and the study of research integrity. , 2001, Croatian medical journal.

[11]  Z. Austin,et al.  Influence of attitudes toward curriculum on dishonest academic behavior. , 2006, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[12]  Brian J. Gaines,et al.  Actions Do Speak Louder than Words: Deterring Plagiarism with the Use of Plagiarism-Detection Software , 2001, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[14]  M. Petrovecki,et al.  Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. , 2005, Croatian medical journal.

[15]  Donald L. Mccabe,et al.  Academic Dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and Contextual Factors , 2008 .

[16]  Miguel Roig The culture of mistrust is already with us , 2008 .

[17]  A. Jordan,et al.  College Student Cheating: The Role of Motivation, Perceived Norms, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Institutional Policy , 2001 .

[18]  R. Malekzadeh,et al.  Iran's scientists condemn instances of plagiarism , 2009, Nature.

[19]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[20]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  I. Ajzen Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .

[22]  J. Couzin-Frankel,et al.  Scientific publishing. Plagiarism sleuths. , 2009, Science.