Reproducibility and a unifying explanation: Lessons from the shape bias.

The goal of science is to advance our understanding of particular phenomena. However, in the field of development, the phenomena of interest are complex, multifaceted, and change over time. Here, we use three decades of research on the shape bias to argue that while replication is clearly an important part of the scientific process, integration across the findings of many studies that include variations in procedure is also critical to create a coherent understanding of the thoughts and behaviors of young children. The "shape bias," or the tendency to generalize a novel label to novel objects of the same shape, is a reliable and robust behavioral finding and has been shown to predict future vocabulary growth and possible language disorders. Despite the robustness of the phenomenon, the way in which the shape bias is defined and tested has varied across studies and laboratories. The current review argues that differences in performance that come from even seemingly minor changes to the participants or task can offer critical insight to underlying mechanisms, and that working to incorporate data from multiple labs is an important way to reveal how task variation and a child's individual pathway creates behavior-a key issue for understanding developmental phenomena.

[1]  S. Prasada,et al.  Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  P. Langley Why a pomegranate? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  G. Altmann,et al.  Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation , 2009, Cognition.

[4]  Jessica S. Horst,et al.  Goodnight book: sleep consolidation improves word learning via storybooks , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[5]  Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole,et al.  What's in a noun? Welsh-, English-, and Spanish- speaking children see it differently , 2000 .

[6]  C. Sandhofer,et al.  Same, varied, or both? Contextual support aids young children in generalizing category labels. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[8]  R. Farivar Dorsal–ventral integration in object recognition , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[9]  Jessica S. Horst,et al.  Get the Story Straight: Contextual Repetition Promotes Word Learning from Storybooks , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[10]  Chen Yu,et al.  Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers , 2012, Cognition.

[11]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[12]  S. Gelman,et al.  Conceptual and linguistic biases in children's word learning. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[13]  N. Soja Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax , 1992 .

[14]  K. Adolph Learning to Move , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[15]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Known and novel noun extensions: attention at two levels of abstraction. , 2003, Child development.

[16]  J. Iverson Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development. , 2010, Journal of child language.

[17]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Early biases and developmental changes in self-generated object views. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[18]  D. Gentner,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence , 1997, Cognition.

[19]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[20]  Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole,et al.  Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean , 1997 .

[21]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Beyond modeling abstractions: learning nouns over developmental time in atypical populations and individuals , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[22]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  Late talkers show no shape bias in a novel name extension task , 2003 .

[23]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Bilingual and Monolingual Children Attend to Different Cues When Learning New Words , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[24]  Aaron T. Buss,et al.  Changes in frontal and posterior cortical activity underlie the early emergence of executive function. , 2018, Developmental science.

[25]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Correlation versus prediction in children's word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[26]  Jessica S. Horst,et al.  Learning What to Remember: Vocabulary Knowledge and Children's Memory for Object Names and Features. , 2016 .

[27]  Natasha Z. Kirkham,et al.  ARTICLE WITH PEER COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task , 2003 .

[28]  T. B. Ward,et al.  Attribute availability and the shape bias in children's category generalization , 1991 .

[29]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[30]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Young Children's Self-Generated Object Views and Object Recognition , 2014, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[31]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? , 1999, Cognition.

[32]  George Farkas,et al.  24-Month-Old Children With Larger Oral Vocabularies Display Greater Academic and Behavioral Functioning at Kindergarten Entry. , 2015, Child development.

[33]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Words, shape, visual search and visual working memory in 3-year-old children. , 2015, Developmental science.

[34]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Linguistic Cues Enhance the Learning of Perceptual Cues , 2005, Psychological science.

[35]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Do children with autism spectrum disorders show a shape bias in word learning? , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[36]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[37]  L. Oakes Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research. , 2017, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[38]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Words can slow down category learning , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[40]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Development as a dynamic system , 1992, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Rigid thinking about deformables: do children sometimes overgeneralize the shape bias? , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[42]  Linda B. Smith Learning to Recognize Objects , 2003, Psychological science.

[43]  Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al.  Complementary learning systems within the hippocampus: A neural network modeling approach to reconciling episodic memory with statistical learning , 2016, bioRxiv.

[44]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Early noun lexicons in English and Japanese , 2001, Cognition.

[45]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Correlation, concepts and cross‐linguistic differences , 2003 .

[46]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Object name learning and object perception: a deficit in late talkers , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[47]  S. Petersen,et al.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Predictable locations aid early object name learning , 2012, Cognition.

[49]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[50]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[51]  Natalie L. Bohlmann,et al.  Bidirectionality in Self-Regulation and Expressive Vocabulary: Comparisons Between Monolingual and Dual Language Learners in Preschool. , 2015, Child development.

[52]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  How children name objects with shoes , 1998 .

[53]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[54]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Is a Pink Cow Still a Cow? Individual Differences in Toddlers' Vocabulary Knowledge and Lexical Representations , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Larissa K Samuelson,et al.  Highchair philosophers: the impact of seating context-dependent exploration on children's naming biases. , 2014, Developmental science.

[56]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. , 2017, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[57]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. , 1991, Child development.

[58]  Peggy Li,et al.  Words as Windows to Thought , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[59]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. , 2000, Child development.

[60]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[61]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it , 2000, Cognition.

[62]  Alexander Etz,et al.  Making replication mainstream , 2017, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[63]  Linda B. Smith From Fragments to Geometric Shape , 2009, Current directions in psychological science.

[64]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Not Only Size Matters: Early-Talker and Late-Talker Vocabularies Support Different Word-Learning Biases in Babies and Networks. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[65]  Linda B. Smith It's all connected: Pathways in visual object recognition and early noun learning. , 2013, The American psychologist.

[66]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  The Shape of the Vocabulary Predicts the Shape of the Bias , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[67]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[68]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Shape, material, and syntax: Interacting forces in children's learning in novel words for objects and substances , 1999 .

[69]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Principle-Based Inferences in Young Children's Categorization: Revisiting the Impact of Function on the Naming of Artifacts. , 1995 .

[70]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  The First Slow Step: Differential Effects of Object and Word-Form Familiarization on Retention of Fast-Mapped Words. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[71]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Inductions from novel categories: The role of language and conceptual structure , 1990 .

[72]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning. , 2005, Psychological review.

[73]  Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole,et al.  Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean , 1997 .

[74]  Mutsurni Irnai,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning : universal ontology and linguistic influence , 1994 .

[75]  J. Rueckl,et al.  Individual differences in the shape bias in preschool children with specific language impairment and typical language development: theoretical and clinical implications. , 2015, Developmental science.

[76]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Active Information Selection: Visual Attention Through the Hands , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[77]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project , 2014 .

[78]  Lynn Perry,et al.  The role of verbal labels in attention to dimensional similarity , 2013, CogSci.

[79]  Denise M Werchan,et al.  Wakefulness (not sleep) promotes generalization of word learning in 2.5-year-old children. , 2014, Child development.

[80]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  Temperamental resistance to control increases the association between sleep problems and externalizing behavior development. , 2007, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[81]  S. Waxman,et al.  Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[82]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Some views are better than others: evidence for a visual bias in object views self-generated by toddlers. , 2014, Developmental science.

[83]  Markus Graf,et al.  Coordinate transformations in object recognition. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[84]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Children's Theories of Word Meaning: The Role of Shape Similarity in Early Acquisition , 1994 .

[85]  J. Iverson,et al.  Object exploration at 6 and 9 months in infants with and without risk for autism , 2014, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[86]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Extracommunicative functions of language: Verbal interference causes selective categorization impairments , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[87]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[88]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Learn Locally, Think Globally , 2010, Psychological science.

[89]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Recognising a zebra from its stripes and the stripes from “zebra”: the role of verbal labels in selecting category relevant information , 2017 .

[90]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  What the online manipulation of linguistic activity can tell us about language and thought , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[91]  Joseph M. Burling,et al.  The Role of Search Speed in the Contextual Cueing of Children's Attention. , 2014, Cognitive development.

[92]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  The dynamic nature of knowledge: Insights from a dynamic field model of children’s novel noun generalization , 2009, Cognition.

[93]  J. Macnamara Cognitive Basis Of Language Learning In Infants , 1984 .

[94]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. , 2012, Psychological review.

[95]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Changes in Visual Object Recognition Precede the Shape Bias in Early Noun Learning , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[96]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Investigating the shape bias in typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorders , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[97]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Dynamic Noun Generalization: Moment-to-Moment Interactions Shape Children's Naming Biases. , 2007 .

[98]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Do infant vocabulary skills predict school-age language and literacy outcomes? , 2015, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[99]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels , 2014, Brain and Language.

[100]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Variability in early communicative development. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[101]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shifting ontological boundaries: how Japanese‐ and English‐speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts , 2003 .

[102]  D. Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Acquiring Proper Nouns for Familiar and Unfamiliar Animate Objects: Two-Year-Olds' Word-learning Biases , 1991 .

[103]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Why is a pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and prior lexical knowledge in children's overextensions of apple and dog , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[104]  E. Bushnell,et al.  Motor development and the mind: the potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. , 1993, Child development.

[105]  E. Markman,et al.  The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[106]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization. , 1998, Developmental psychology.