Reversibility in nucleocytoplasmic transport

Nucleocytoplasmic exchange of proteins and RNAs is mediated by receptors that usher their cargo through the nuclear pores. Peptide localization signals on each cargo determine the receptors with which it will interact. Those interactions are normally regulated by the small GTPase Ran. Hydrolysis of GTP provides the chemical energy required to create a bona fide thermodynamic pump that selectively and directionally accumulates its substrates across the nuclear envelope. A common perception is that cargo delivery is irreversible, e.g., a protein imported to the nucleus does not return to the cytoplasm except perhaps via a specific export receptor. Quantitative measurements using cell-free nuclei reconstituted in Xenopus egg extract show that nuclear accumulation follows first-order kinetics and reaches steady state at a level that follows a Michaelis–Menten function of the cytoplasmic cargo concentration. This saturation suggests that receptor-mediated translocation across the nuclear pore occurs bidirectionally. The reversibility of accumulation was demonstrated directly by exchange of the cytosolic medium and by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Based on our results, we offer a simple biophysical model that predicts the observed behavior. A far-reaching consequence is that the nuclear localization signal dictates the fate of a protein population rather than that of the individual molecules that bear it, which remain free to shuttle back and forth. This implies an open communication between the nucleus and cytoplasm and a ubiquitous mechanism for signaling in both directions.

[1]  S. Bagley,et al.  The nuclear pore complex. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[2]  G. Riddick,et al.  A systems analysis of importin-α–β mediated nuclear protein import , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  U. Aebi,et al.  Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Endo,et al.  tRNA Actively Shuttles Between the Nucleus and Cytosol in Yeast , 2005, Science.

[5]  M. Lohka,et al.  Roles of cytosol and cytoplasmic particles in nuclear envelope assembly and sperm pronuclear formation in cell-free preparations from amphibian eggs , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Allison Paradise,et al.  Significant proportions of nuclear transport proteins with reduced intracellular mobilities resolved by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  M. Nachury,et al.  The direction of transport through the nuclear pore can be inverted. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Michael P. Rout,et al.  Simple kinetic relationships and nonspecific competition govern nuclear import rates in vivo , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  V. Uversky,et al.  Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  K. Zerf,et al.  Optical recording of signal-mediated protein transport through single nuclear pore complexes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  C. Fradin,et al.  Dissociation of nuclear import cargo complexes by the protein Ran: a fluorescence correlation spectroscopy study. , 2005, Comptes rendus biologies.

[12]  Egg extracts for nuclear import and nuclear assembly reactions. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[13]  Bostjan Kobe,et al.  Biophysical Characterization of Interactions Involving Importin-α during Nuclear Import* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  S. Vasu,et al.  Nuclear pores and nuclear assembly. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[15]  W. Stein Kinetics of transport: analyzing, testing, and characterizing models using kinetic approaches. , 1989, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  L. Loew,et al.  Systems Analysis of Ran Transport , 2002, Science.

[17]  M. Rout,et al.  The Nuclear Pore Complex as a Transport Machine* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  W. Richardson,et al.  The nucleoplasmin nuclear location sequence is larger and more complex than that of SV-40 large T antigen , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  I. Mattaj,et al.  The strategy for coupling the RanGTP gradient to nuclear protein export , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  E. Schwoebel,et al.  Ran-dependent Signal-mediated Nuclear Import Does Not Require GTP Hydrolysis by Ran* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  G. Blobel,et al.  Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins , 1995, Cell.

[22]  I. Macara Transport into and out of the Nucleus , 2001, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[23]  N. Imamoto,et al.  β-Subunit of Nuclear Pore-targeting Complex (Importin-β) Can Be Exported from the Nucleus in a Ran-independent Manner* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  U. Kutay,et al.  Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. , 1999, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[25]  R. C. Chan,et al.  In vitro study of nuclear assembly and nuclear import using Xenopus egg extracts. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  K Ribbeck,et al.  Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[27]  Yoshiyuki Matsuura,et al.  Structural basis for nuclear import complex dissociation by RanGTP , 2005, Nature.

[28]  Dirk Görlich,et al.  Characterization of Ran‐driven cargo transport and the RanGTPase system by kinetic measurements and computer simulation , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[29]  H. Wodrich,et al.  Influence of cargo size on Ran and energy requirements for nuclear protein import , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  U. Kutay,et al.  The translocation of transportin–cargo complexes through nuclear pores is independent of both Ran and energy , 1999, Current Biology.

[31]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  Import and export of the nuclear protein import receptor transportin by a mechanism independent of GTP hydrolysis , 1998, Current Biology.

[32]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin β concentration , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  A Novel Receptor-Mediated Nuclear Protein Import Pathway , 1996, Cell.

[34]  M. Hetzer,et al.  Nuclear Pores Form de Novo from Both Sides of the Nuclear Envelope , 2006, Science.

[35]  L. Gerace,et al.  Gradient of Increasing Affinity of Importin β for Nucleoporins along the Pathway of Nuclear Import , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  C. Fradin,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy close to a fluctuating membrane. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[37]  B. Paschal,et al.  Mechanisms of Receptor‐Mediated Nuclear Import and Nuclear Export , 2005, Traffic.

[38]  Ralf P. Richter,et al.  FG-Rich Repeats of Nuclear Pore Proteins Form a Three-Dimensional Meshwork with Hydrogel-Like Properties , 2006, Science.