A Comparative Study of Resource Allocation Schemes in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks on the Downlink

Network densification through heterogeneous networks (HetNets) is considered as a promising paradigm to address the ever increasing mobile users’ data demands in 5G networks. A HetNet consists of macro cells (each with a macro base station) overlaid with a number of small cells (each with a low-power base station) and has been shown to significantly improve the network capacity when supported by carefully designed radio resource management (RRM) techniques. RRM is typically studied via a joint optimisation problem over three network processes, namely, resource allocation (RA), user association (UA) and user scheduling (US), and is the focus of this thesis. Our first objective is to characterise the optimal HetNet performance by jointly optimising these three processes through a unified framework under different channel deployment scenarios. Towards this, we focus on two RA schemes, namely, partially shared deployment (PSD) and co-channel deployment with almost blank subframes (ABS), proposed by 3GPP for future HetNets. In the first part of the thesis, we revisit a unified optimisation framework under PSD that allows us to configure the network parameters (e.g., number of channels per-cell and power per-channel) and allocate optimal throughputs to users in a fair manner. The framework under consideration is based on a snapshot model where, in each snapshot, the number of users and channel gains are assumed to be fixed and known. Although the previous study on this framework provides many interesting engineering insights, it is primarily based on two wrong assumptions in terms of channel modelling and US which we correct in our work. We also revisit a similar framework but under ABS and conduct a thorough comparative study between ABS and PSD. We first show that the α−fair scheduling problem under ABS is generally much more involved than that under PSD for α 6= 1. To verify whether the US complexities involved from deploying ABS are justifiable, we compare the throughput performance of the two schemes under a static setting, where the number of users in each snapshot is assumed to be fixed. Our results indicate that PSD outperforms ABS for different choices of α and under different HetNet configurations. In the second part of the thesis, we further study our frameworks under a dynamic

[1]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Impact of limited backhaul capacity on user scheduling in heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[2]  Markus Rupp,et al.  Simulating the Long Term Evolution physical layer , 2009, 2009 17th European Signal Processing Conference.

[3]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Redefinition of max-min fairness in multi-hop wireless networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Rajeev Agrawal,et al.  Optimal muting and load balancing for eICIC , 2013, 2013 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[5]  Rayadurgam Srikant,et al.  The Mathematics of Internet Congestion Control , 2003 .

[6]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[7]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Joint Resource Allocation and User Association for Heterogeneous Wireless Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocell networks: a survey , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Kiran Somasundaram Proportional Fairness in LTE-Advanced Heterogeneous Networks with eICIC , 2013, 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[10]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000, TNET.

[11]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Ramachandran Ramjee,et al.  Generalized Proportional Fair Scheduling in Third Generation Wireless Data Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[13]  Xiaoli Chu,et al.  Mobility management challenges in 3GPP heterogeneous networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Narayan Prasad,et al.  Exploiting cell dormancy and load balancing in LTE HetNets: Optimizing the proportional fairness utility , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[15]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Mobility enhancements for LTE-advanced multilayer networks with inter-site carrier aggregation , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[17]  Supratim Deb,et al.  Algorithms for Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (eICIC) in LTE HetNets , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[18]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  User Association for Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[19]  Jagadish Ghimire,et al.  Heterogeneous Cellular Networks: From Resource Allocation To User Association , 2015 .

[20]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocells: Past, Present, and Future , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Terahertz band: Next frontier for wireless communications , 2014, Phys. Commun..

[22]  Lutz H.-J. Lampe,et al.  Multiple-antenna techniques for wireless communications - a comprehensive literature survey , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[23]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  On/off macrocells and load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[24]  Ling Qiu,et al.  Joint User Association and Interference Coordination in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[25]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Dynamic association for load balancing and interference avoidance in multi-cell networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[26]  Erik Dahlman,et al.  4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband , 2011 .

[27]  Yang Richard Yang,et al.  Proportional Fairness in Multi-Rate Wireless LANs , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[28]  Dariush Fooladivanda,et al.  Comparison between Static and Dynamic Modeling Approaches for Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2014 .

[29]  William Webb Wireless Communications: The Future , 2007 .

[30]  Rui Chang,et al.  Interference coordination and cancellation for 4G networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[31]  Naga Bhushan,et al.  LTE-Advanced: Heterogeneous networks , 2010, 2010 European Wireless Conference (EW).

[32]  Holger Claussen,et al.  Towards 1 Gbps/UE in Cellular Systems: Understanding Ultra-Dense Small Cell Deployments , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.