Where are we with Web-based learning in medical education?

This article summarizes several years of research in Web-based learning (WBL) to illustrate that, in general, research fails to address the questions that will inform our use of this powerful tool. In particular, media-comparative research—the comparison of WBL to another medium (e.g. lecture)—is hopelessly confounded and does little to inform practice. Rather than asking ‘If’ we should use WBL (we should!), researchers should ask ‘How’ and ‘When’ to use WBL. ‘How’ will be answered by evaluating specific elements of instructional design including theory-based instructional methods, adaptations to individual characteristics and details of presentation enhancements. ‘When’ will require study of issues such as just-in-time learning, effective use of simulation, and integration of WBL within and between institutions. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods will be useful. Educators should also look outside medical education for evidence and theories to guide their practice. Finally, while WBL has many advantages it is not inherently better than other media. The author suggests that learning outcomes be defined first and WBL be used only when it appears to be the most effective means of achieving these outcomes.

[1]  G O Barnett,et al.  “Just‐in‐time” clinical information , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[3]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[4]  David A Cook,et al.  Web-Based Learning in Residents’ Continuity Clinics: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  H. Polatajko,et al.  Exploring organizational characteristics associated with practice changes following a mentored online educational module , 2005, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[6]  S. Levy,et al.  Teaching paediatric residents about learning disorders: use of standardised case discussion versus multimedia computer tutorial , 2005, Medical education.

[7]  Bruce Jarrell,et al.  A Basis for Electronic Cognitive Simulation: The Heuristic Patient , 2005, Surgical innovation.

[8]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[9]  G. Hanley.  e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction , 2004 .

[11]  Lih-Wei Lei,et al.  Evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in histology: effect of interaction on learning outcome. , 2005, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[12]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Editorial: Individual differences in web-based instruction - an overview , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  D. Bell,et al.  Self-Study from Web-Based and Printed Guideline Materials , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  G. Norman.  RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments , 2003, Medical education.

[15]  Riccardo Maviglia,et al.  Online vs live methods for teaching difficult airway management to anesthesiology residents , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Confounding in Educational Computing Research , 1985 .

[17]  K. B. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying the Literature of Computer‐aided Instruction in Medical Education , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  Carol Jollie,et al.  Web based learning , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  D. Cook.  Learning and Cognitive Styles in Web-Based Learning: Theory, Evidence, and Application , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  Heidi S Chumley-Jones,et al.  Web‐based Learning: Sound Educational Method or Hype? A Review of the Evaluation Literature , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive educational systems on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[22]  James J. Quattrochi,et al.  Evaluation of an Interactive Case-based Online Network (ICON) in a Problem Based Learning Environment , 2005, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[23]  Andrew R. Molnar.  Computers in education: A brief history , 1997 .

[24]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[25]  C P Friedman,et al.  The research we should be doing , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[26]  R E LaPorte,et al.  Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures? , 2001, Public Health.

[27]  M. Malbrán.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , 2007 .

[28]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[29]  C. Dhein.  Online small animal case simulations, a.k.a. the Virtual Veterinary Clinic. , 2005, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education.

[30]  David A Cook,et al.  Impact of Self-Assessment Questions and Learning Styles in Web-Based Learning: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  Tim Dornan,et al.  How can medical students learn in a self‐directed way in the clinical environment? Design‐based research , 2005, Medical education.

[32]  P. Frey,et al.  Attitude towards computer‐based learning: determinants as revealed by a controlled interventional study , 2005, Medical education.

[33]  L. Niemi‐Murola.  The Association for Medical Education in Europe , 1982, British journal of medical education.

[34]  D. Cook.  The Research We Still Are Not Doing: An Agenda for the Study of Computer-Based Learning , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.