Aneurysm Sac Pressure Measurement with Minimally Invasive Implantable Pressure Sensors: An Alternative to Current Surveillance Regimes after EVAR?

Current protocols for surveillance after endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms are mostly based on costly and time-consuming imaging procedures and aim to detect adverse events such as graft migration, endoleaks or aneurysm sac enlargement. These imaging procedures are either associated with radiation exposure to the patients or may be harmful to the patient due to the use of iodine- or gadolinium-containing contrast agents. Furthermore the advantages of EVAR in the short term might be negated by the necessity for endograft surveillance over years. Thus, alternative modalities for follow-up are being investigated. One of these technologies provides pressure information directly from the aneurysm sac. This noninvasive, telemetric pressure sensing was tested in vitro as well as in first clinical trials and was able to identify successful aneurysm exclusion after EVAR. The telemetric pressure sensors showed a promising efficacy and accuracy in detecting type I and type III endoleaks and will help to clarify the clinical relevance of type II endoleaks. This article provides an overview of the in vitro sensors investigated as well as the first clinical trials and the sensors’ potential to change the current endograft surveillance regimes.

[1]  J. Parodi,et al.  Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms , 1991, Annals of vascular surgery.

[2]  G. White,et al.  Endotension: An Explanation for Continued AAA Growth after Successful Endoluminal Repair , 1999, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[3]  D. Gould,et al.  Endotension after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Definition, Classification, and Strategies for Surveillance and Intervention , 1999, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[4]  R. Fairman,et al.  Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  S. Haulon,et al.  Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. , 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  P. Desgranges,et al.  Follow-up evaluation of endoluminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms with duplex ultrasonography: validation with computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  C. Loewe,et al.  MR angiography vs CT angiography in the follow-up of nitinol stent grafts in endoluminally treated aortic aneurysms , 2002, European Radiology.

[8]  A. Aschoff,et al.  [The contribution of MRI to the detection of endovascular aneurysm repair]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[9]  H. Brambs,et al.  Wertigkeit der MRT in der Erkennung von Leckagen nach endovaskulärer Aneurysmaausschaltung , 2002 .

[10]  M. Cejna,et al.  Imaging of aortic stent-grafts and endoleaks. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[11]  P. Bendick,et al.  Duplex ultrasound imaging with ultrasound contrast: an economic alternative for aortic stent graft surveillance , 2003 .

[12]  A. Westfall,et al.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in “High-Risk” Surgical Patients: Comparison of Open and Endovascular Repair , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[13]  G. White,et al.  Endotension. A review of current views on pathophysiology and treatment. , 2003, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  Krassi Ivancev,et al.  Intra-aneurysm pressure measurements in successfully excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  B. Sonesson,et al.  Direct intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement using tip-pressure sensors: in vivo and in vitro evaluation. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: contrast-enhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair. , 2004, Radiology.

[17]  J. Blankensteijn,et al.  Noninvasive Intrasac Pressure Measurement and the Influence of Type 2 and Type 3 Endoleaks in an Animal Model of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2004, Vascular.

[18]  J. Blankensteijn,et al.  Durability and Validity of a Remote, Miniaturized Pressure Sensor in an Animal Model of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[19]  B. Sonesson,et al.  Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  M. Addis,et al.  First experience in human beings with a permanently implantable intrasac pressure transducer for monitoring endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  A. AbuRahma,et al.  Computed Tomography versus Color Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Abdominal Aortic Stent-Grafts , 2005, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[22]  Jafar Golzarian,et al.  Endoleakage after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: diagnosis, significance and treatment , 2006, European Radiology.

[23]  M. Thelen,et al.  MRI versus helical CT for endoleak detection after endovascular aneurysm repair. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  M. Allen,et al.  Micromachined endovascularly-implantable wireless aneurysm pressure sensors: from concept to clinic , 2005, The 13th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 2005. Digest of Technical Papers. TRANSDUCERS '05..

[25]  W. Mokwa,et al.  Pressure sensor capsule to control the treatment of abdominal aorta aneurisms , 2005, The 13th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 2005. Digest of Technical Papers. TRANSDUCERS '05..

[26]  E. Choke,et al.  Color Duplex Ultrasonography is Insensitive for the Detection of Endoleak after Aortic Endografting: A Systematic Review , 2005, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[27]  Elliot L Chaikof,et al.  Future of endograft surveillance. , 2006, Seminars in vascular surgery.

[28]  P. Faries,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a wireless pressure sensor in a canine model of retrograde-collateral (type II) endoleak and correlation with histologic analysis. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[29]  M. Fonseca,et al.  FLEXIBLE WIRELESS PASSIVE PRESSURE SENSORS FOR BIOMEDICAL APPLICATONS , 2006 .

[30]  Zhonghua Sun Diagnostic value of color duplex ultrasonography in the follow-up of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[31]  R. Milner,et al.  Aneurysm Sac Pressure Measurement with a Pressure Sensor in Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair , 2006, Vascular.

[32]  M. Viergever,et al.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging of endoleaks after EVAR. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[33]  A. Lumsden,et al.  Contrast-enhanced Duplex surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: improved efficacy using a continuous infusion technique. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[34]  M. Addis,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair: correlation with chronic sac pressure measurement. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[35]  Thomas Schmitz-Rode,et al.  Detecting endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair with a minimally invasive, implantable, telemetric pressure sensor: an in vitro study , 2007, European Radiology.

[36]  V. Runge,et al.  Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: A Review of 6 Cases Temporally Related to Gadodiamide Injection (Omniscan) , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[37]  K. Murphy,et al.  Gadolinium-based contrast media and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal insufficiency. , 2007, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[38]  Rodney A. White,et al.  Initial results of wireless pressure sensing for endovascular aneurysm repair: the APEX Trial--Acute Pressure Measurement to Confirm Aneurysm Sac EXclusion. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[39]  A. Djamali,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. , 2007, Radiology.

[40]  M. Pedersen Safety update on the possible causal relationship between gadolinium‐containing MRI agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  S. Cowper,et al.  Gadolinium is detectable within the tissue of patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[42]  MR angiography for patient surveillance after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.