Integrating cheminformatic analysis in combinatorial chemistry.

Cheminformatic analysis of drug-related compound databases has enabled the identification of the physicochemical properties that have the greatest influence on determining the drug-like characteristics of a compound. This enables definition of the parameters and profiles used in constructing a high-quality combinatorial library. Awareness of the multi-objective nature of combinatorial library construction has also given rise to techniques designed to enhance the likelihood of including the best compounds in a given library.

[1]  George M. Milne,et al.  Chapter 35. Pharmaceutical productivity — the imperative for new paradigms , 2003 .

[2]  Steven L. Teig,et al.  Luddite: An Information-Theoretic Library Design Tool , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Eric A Jamois,et al.  Reagent-based and product-based computational approaches in library design. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[4]  Y. Martin.  Diverse viewpoints on computational aspects of molecular diversity. , 2001, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[5]  J. Blake.  Examination of the computed molecular properties of compounds selected for clinical development. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[6]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Tudor I. Oprea.  Current trends in lead discovery: Are we looking for the appropriate properties? , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[8]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[9]  Trudi Wright,et al.  Optimizing the Size and Configuration of Combinatorial Libraries , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[11]  A. Hopkins,et al.  The druggable genome , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  R. Spencer,et al.  High-throughput screening of historic collections: observations on file size, biological targets, and file diversity. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Wolfgang H. B. Sauer,et al.  Molecular Shape Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries: A Prerequisite for Broad Bioactivity , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[14]  C. Lipinski.  Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[15]  Y. Martin,et al.  Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Daniel C. Weaver.  Applying data mining techniques to library design, lead generation and lead optimization. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[17]  J. Proudfoot.  Drugs, leads, and drug-likeness: an analysis of some recently launched drugs. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[18]  James F Blake,et al.  Structure-based generation of viable leads from small combinatorial libraries. , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[19]  Robert D. Clark,et al.  OptDesign: Extending Optimizable k-Dissimilarity Selection to Combinatorial Library Design , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[20]  S. Venkatesh,et al.  Role of the development scientist in compound lead selection and optimization. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[21]  E. Bradley,et al.  Comparing performance of computational tools for combinatorial library design. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  A. Stevens,et al.  Computational design strategies for combinatorial libraries. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[23]  P. Leeson,et al.  A comparison of physiochemical property profiles of development and marketed oral drugs. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[24]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[26]  Ellen R. Laird,et al.  Chppter 30. Recent advances in virtual ligand screening , 2003 .

[27]  Fei Gu,et al.  Design of Diverse and Focused Combinatorial Libraries Using an Alternating Algorithm , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[28]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[29]  Roland E Dolle,et al.  Comprehensive survey of combinatorial library synthesis: 2002. , 2003, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[30]  E. Bradley,et al.  Informative library design as an efficient strategy to identify and optimize leads: application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 antagonists. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.