Accessibility of Urban Forests and Parks for People with Disabilities in Wheelchairs, Considering the Surface and Longitudinal Slope of the Trails

This research deals with the problem of the accessibility of urban forests and parks for people with disabilities in wheelchairs. Through an analysis of spatial data, trails were categorized on the basis of the measurements of the independent movements of eight subjects on six trails. The critical longitudinal slopes were determined for independent movement in wheelchairs, complex independent movement with certain risk, and categories of trails that are not suitable for wheelchair movement. The results indicate that a slope of 5.50% was the tipping point, after which all respondents experienced some uncertainty. In addition, a gradient of more than 9.01% was almost impassable for people in wheelchairs, with respect to the gravel trails examined in this study. Modern measurement technology was used in the field, including the mobile apps GAIA GPS and GNSS GPS, and a total (geodetic) station; the subjects’ heart rates were measured using a Garmin Fenix 6 Pro watch. In addition, people with disabilities were included in the implementation of the research through the Croatian Association of Paraplegics and Tetraplegics (HUPT). The results indicate the zones/trails that disabled people in wheelchairs can pass independently, the zones that can be accessed with a certain risk, and those that are not accessible, all according to the defined longitudinal slope zones using measurements of the movement of people in a wheelchair, their heart rate loads, and personal communication with the subjects regarding the insecurity they felt.

[1]  M. Paraschiv,et al.  Measuring Distances and Areas under Forest Canopy Conditions—A Comparison of Handheld Mobile Laser Scanner and Handheld Global Navigation Satellite System , 2022, Forests.

[2]  A. Lajunen,et al.  Evaluation of Forest Features Determining GNSS Positioning Accuracy of a Novel Low-Cost, Mobile RTK System Using LiDAR and TreeNet , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[3]  K. Fransen,et al.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of and attitudes towards urban forests and green spaces: Exploring the instigators of change in Belgium , 2021, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[4]  B. Qin,et al.  Understanding the relationship between neighbourhood green space and mental wellbeing: A case study of Beijing, China , 2021 .

[5]  G. Winkel,et al.  COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure , 2020, Forest Policy and Economics.

[6]  T. V. Prabhakar,et al.  Hummingbird: energy efficient GPS receiver for small satellites , 2020, MobiCom.

[7]  J. Fialová,et al.  Preferences of people with disabilities on wheelchairs in relation to forest trails for recreational in selected European countries , 2016 .

[8]  Philippe Fauquet-Alekhine,et al.  Heart rate vs stress indicator for short term mental stress , 2016 .

[9]  Marco Roccetti,et al.  Crowdsourcing Urban Accessibility:: Some Preliminary Experiences with Results , 2015, CHItaly.

[10]  Donghun Lee,et al.  Effects of ramp slope, ramp height and users' pushing force on performance, muscular activity and subjective ratings during wheelchair driving on a ramp , 2014 .

[11]  Martina Artmann,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation , 2014, AMBIO.

[12]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Personalized accessibility map (PAM): a novel assisted wayfinding approach for people with disabilities , 2014, Ann. GIS.

[13]  H. Frumkin,et al.  Nature and health. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[14]  R. Mitchell,et al.  The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study , 2014, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[15]  Shoichiro Fujisawa,et al.  Evaluation of physical load while propelling manual wheelchair on cross slope road and wave road , 2013 .

[16]  J. Pearce,et al.  Is level of neighbourhood green space associated with physical activity in green space? , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[17]  P. Kokkinos,et al.  Physical Activity, Health Benefits, and Mortality Risk , 2012, ISRN cardiology.

[18]  P. Aspinall,et al.  More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns , 2012 .

[19]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Well-being, Reasonableness, and the Natural Environment , 2011 .

[20]  Takemi Sugiyama,et al.  Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[21]  Steven N. Blair,et al.  Physical activity: health outcomes and importance for public health policy. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[22]  Sean Bennett,et al.  Wheelchair accessibility: Descriptive survey of curb ramps in an urban area , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[23]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? , 2006 .

[24]  D. Warburton,et al.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[25]  E. Naesset,et al.  Assessing Point Accuracy of DGPS Under Forest Canopy Before Data Acquisition, in the Field and After Postprocessing , 2002 .

[26]  P. Bolstad,et al.  Forest canopy, terrain, and distance effects on global positioning system point accuracy , 1996 .

[27]  Fang Wei Greener urbanization? Changing accessibility to parks in China , 2017 .

[28]  Rachid Aissaoui,et al.  Pushrim biomechanical changes with progressive increases in slope during motorized treadmill manual wheelchair propulsion in individuals with spinal cord injury. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  Jasper Schipperijn,et al.  Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space , 2013 .

[30]  W. Millar Understanding disability. , 1991, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[31]  Michael Oliver,et al.  The Politics of Disablement , 1990 .