Human treadmill walking needs attention

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to assess the attentional requirements of steady state treadmill walking in human subjects using a dual task paradigm. The extent of decrement of a secondary (cognitive) RT task provides a measure of the attentional resources required to maintain performance of the primary (locomotor) task. Varying the level of difficulty of the reaction time (RT) task is used to verify the priority of allocation of attentional resources.Methods11 healthy adult subjects were required to walk while simultaneously performing a RT task. Participants were instructed to bite a pressure transducer placed in the mouth as quickly as possible in response to an unpredictable electrical stimulation applied on the back of the neck. Each subject was tested under five different experimental conditions: simple RT task alone and while walking, recognition RT task alone and while walking, walking alone. A foot switch system composed of a pressure sensitive sensor was placed under the heel and forefoot of each foot to determine the gait cycle duration.ResultsGait cycle duration was unchanged (p > 0.05) by the addition of the RT task. Regardless of the level of difficulty of the RT task, the RTs were longer during treadmill walking than in sitting conditions (p < 0.01) indicating that an increased amount of resources are required for the maintainance of walking performance on a treadmill at a steady state. No interaction (p > 0.05) was found between the attentional demand of the walking task and the decrement of performance found in the RT task under varying levels of difficulty. This finding suggests that the healthy subjects prioritized the control of walking at the expense of cognitive performance.ConclusionWe conclude that treadmill walking in young adults is not a purely automatic task. The methodology and outcome measures used in this study provide an assessment of the attentional resources required by walking on the treadmill at a steady state.

[1]  P. Tsang,et al.  Viability of resource theories in explaining time-sharing performance. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[2]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  J. Duysens,et al.  Neural control of locomotion; Part 1: The central pattern generator from cats to humans , 1998 .

[4]  C. Bard,et al.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  P. Baltes,et al.  Walking While Memorizing: Age-Related Differences in Compensatory Behavior , 2001, Psychological science.

[6]  S. Brauer,et al.  Simplest tasks have greatest dual task interference with balance in brain injured adults. , 2004, Human movement science.

[7]  A. Prochazka Sensorimotor gain control: A basic strategy of motor systems? , 1989, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  Douglas G. Stuart,et al.  Neural Control of Locomotion , 1976, Advances in Behavioral Biology.

[9]  William H. Gage,et al.  The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  D. Pins,et al.  On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron’s law and choice reaction time , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  A P Marsh,et al.  The effect of age on the attentional demands of postural control. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[12]  B. Abernethy Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: Some applications and methodological constraints , 1988 .

[13]  B. Bussel,et al.  Evidence for Cognitive Processes Involved in the Control of Steady State of Walking in Healthy Subjects and after Cerebral Damage , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Caterina Rosano,et al.  Reciprocal influence of concurrent walking and cognitive testing on performance in older adults. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[15]  M. Gardner,et al.  Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  N Lavie,et al.  Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[17]  C Bonnet,et al.  The Piéron function in the threshold region , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Nicolas Vuillerme,et al.  Attentional demands associated with the use of a light fingertip touch for postural control during quiet standing , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Susan Kemper,et al.  The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[20]  J Duysens,et al.  Postural control and cognitive task performance in healthy participants while balancing on different support-surface configurations. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[21]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Van de Crommert HW,et al.  Neural control of locomotion; The central pattern generator from cats to humans. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[23]  H. V. D. Crommert,et al.  Neural control of locomotion: sensory control of the central pattern generator and its relation to treadmill training. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[24]  Roger P. Woods,et al.  Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  W. Sparrow,et al.  Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. , 2002, Human movement science.

[26]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  J. Nielsen How we Walk: Central Control of Muscle Activity during Human Walking , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[28]  E. Zehr,et al.  Regulation of Arm and Leg Movement during Human Locomotion , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[29]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[30]  K Kurosawa Effects of various walking speeds on probe reaction time during treadmill walking. , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  O. Beauchet,et al.  Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  Serene S Paul,et al.  Is automaticity of walking regained after stroke? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[33]  M. MacKay-Lyons Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[34]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  The interplay of attention and bimanual coordination dynamics. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[35]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Assessment of motor recovery and decline. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[36]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  M. Grabiner,et al.  Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  Nicolas Vuillerme,et al.  Attentional demand for regulating postural sway: the effect of expertise in gymnastics , 2004, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[41]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  The attentional demands of preferred and non-preferred gait patterns. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[42]  H. Barbeau Locomotor Training in Neurorehabilitation: Emerging Rehabilitation Concepts , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[43]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  V. Dietz Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Locomotion-respiration coupling: an account of the underlying dynamics. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.