Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental

Few studies have been published assessing patients sporting activity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Common concerns of patients undergoing TKA or UKA are whether they can continue with sporting activities after surgery. This study compares the sporting activity of TKA and UKA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 110 patients were surveyed by questionnaire. Seventy-six patients had undergone TKA and 34 patients had undergone UKA. They were assessed for their participation in low-impact sport preoperatively and postoperatively at a mean follow up of 21.6 ± 5.3 and 22.3 ± 7.8 months, respectively. Low-impact sports are those which a surgeon would expect patients to be able to participate in postoperatively. Data were separately analysed for older and younger patients and women and men, respectively. The results were as follows: before surgery, 55 of 76 patients in the TKA group participated in an average of 1.3 different sports and postoperatively, 35 of 76 patients participated in an average of 0.7 different sports. In the UKA group, 30 of 34 patients participated in an average of 1.5 different sports preoperatively and postoperatively, 29 of 34 patients participated in an average of 1.4 different sports. The return to sport rate was 96.7% in the UKA group and 63.6% in the TKA group. In the TKA group, the average frequency of sport preoperatively was 3.0 sessions per week (62.7 min) and postoperatively it decreased to 2.0 sessions per week (37.5 minutes). In the UKA group, the average frequency of sport preoperatively was 3.2 sessions per week (85.0 min) and postoperatively it increased to 3.4 sessions per week (92.1 min). The average time before resuming sport after surgery was 4.1 months in the TKA group and 3.6 months in the UKA group; 42.9% of patients in the TKA group and 24.1% of patients in the UKA group reported pain during sports after surgery; 80.3% of the patients in the TKA group and 88.2% of the patients in the UKA group felt that surgery had increased or maintained their sporting ability. Oxford knee scores decreased significantly one year after surgery in both the TKA group and the UKA group. In conclusion, the patients in our study had a significantly greater return to sport rate after UKA than patients who had undergone TKA. A large proportion of patients in the TKA group did not return to sport which their surgeon would have expected them to including golf and bowls. Patients in the UKA group also took part in more sporting sessions and for a longer period of time than patients in the TKA group. Moreover, patients undergoing UKA also returned to sport more quickly than patients undergoing TKA.

[1]  P. Lewis,et al.  Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  A. Amin,et al.  Unicompartmental or Total Knee Arthroplasty?: Results from a Matched Study , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  M. Agarwal,et al.  Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Knee.

[4]  John H. Newman,et al.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. , 1998 .

[5]  J. Newman,et al.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  F. Sim,et al.  Participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty: review of literature and survey of surgeon preferences. , 1995, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[7]  J J Callaghan,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty in active golfers. , 1993, Journal of Arthroplasty.

[8]  J. Newman,et al.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  S. Yeo,et al.  Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty--early results of a matched-pair comparison. , 2003, Singapore medical journal.

[10]  B. Espehaug,et al.  Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  D. Beard,et al.  Sensory dysfunction in the great toe in hallux valgus. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  M. Cross,et al.  Participation in Sports After Total Knee Replacement , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  D. Murray,et al.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  P. Lewis,et al.  Patient-Perceived Outcomes and Return to Sport and Work: TKA Versus Mini-Incision Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty , 2010, The journal of knee surgery.

[15]  T. Drobný,et al.  Return to Sports and Recreational Activity after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.