Contemporary Installation Art and Phenomenon of Digital Interactivity: Aha Experiences - Recognition and Related Creating with and for Affordances

Observing audience attendance of a student created interactive art installation is posited relating to phenomenon of serendipity, brought about via cumulated conditions and strategies, synchronously resulting in an author-recognized ‘Aha experience’. Identifying of engagement, then disengagement, and subsequent re-engagement informs reflections and critique. Speculation to how multi-affordances in an interactive art installation can combine with perceptual and cognitive pre-knowledge, e.g. pervasiveness of sensors in contemporary society (as audience pre-knowledge), to influence audience expectation, explorations, and engagement experiences. This contextually illustrated in how affordances (false/perceptual/hidden) of the installation became aspects that unwittingly and coincidentally cumulated to establish a critical incident moment: A period in time that serendipitously and synchronously involved observation of audience disengagement following initial confrontation immediately followed by a system reset that stimulated (as if playfully) re-engagement. Conclusions question how a strategy of playful artistic design that incorporates such audience perceptual and cognitive influencing through affordances can be a potential factor utilized in realizing interactive art installations. Posited thus is a contemporary art strategy goal to engage beyond artless mapping (e.g. one-to-one) toward more stimulating, intellectual, and enjoyable audience experience.

[1]  Nicolas De Oliveira,et al.  Installation Art in the New Millennium: The Empire of the Senses , 2003 .

[2]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Gaining Insight Into the “Aha” Experience , 2010 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[4]  Poul Bitsch Olsen,et al.  Problem-oriented project work: a workbook , 2008 .

[5]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[6]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[8]  Ryszard W. Kluszczynski,et al.  Strategies of interactive art , 2010 .

[9]  Jörg Müller,et al.  The Audience Funnel: Observations of Gesture Based Interaction With Multiple Large Displays in a City Center , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Susie Cobbledick.  The Information-Seeking Behavior of Artists: Exploratory Interviews , 1996, The Library Quarterly.

[11]  William W. Gaver.  Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[12]  D. Norman.  The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[13]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[14]  Royston M. Roberts,et al.  Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science , 1989 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  Marcus Bowles,et al.  Relearning to E-learn: Strategies for Electronic Learning and Knowledge , 2004 .

[17]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Reclaiming public space: designing for public interaction with private devices , 2007, TEI.