Psychophysical Evaluation for a Qualitative Semantic Image Categorisation and Retrieval Approach

This paper details the behavioral evaluation of a qualitative image categorisation and retrieval approach using semantic features of images. Content based image retrieval and classification systems are highly active research areas and a cognitively plausible image description can improve effectiveness of such systems. While most approaches focus on low level image feature in order to classify images, humans, while certainly relying on some aspects of low level features, also apply high-level classifications. These high-level classification are often qualitative in nature and we have implemented a qualitative image categorisation and retrieval framework to account for human cognitive principles. While the dataset, i.e. the image database that was used for classification and retrieval purposes contained images that where annotated and therefore provided some ground truth for assessing the validity of the algorithm, we decided to add an additional behavioral evaluation step: Participants performed similarity ratings on a carefully chosen subset of picture implemented as a grouping task. Instead of using a predefined number of categories, participants could make their own choice on a) how many groups they thought were appropriate and b) which icons/images belong into these groups. The results show that the overall underlying conceptual structure created by the participants corresponds well to the classification provided through the algorithm.

[1]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Image Retrieval: Current Techniques, Promising Directions, and Open Issues , 1999, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[2]  Tom Minka,et al.  Vision texture for annotation , 1995, Multimedia Systems.

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Image classification for content-based indexing , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Fabian Mörchen,et al.  Mining Hierarchical Temporal Patterns in Multivariate Time Series , 2004, KI.

[5]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[6]  John Weinman,et al.  The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. , 2005, British journal of health psychology.

[7]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Qualitative Approaches to Semantic Scene Modelling and Retrieval , 2006, SGAI Conf..

[8]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  A Semantic Typicality Measure for Natural Scene Categorization , 2004, DAGM-Symposium.

[9]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  On image classification: city vs. landscape , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries (Cat. No.98EX173).

[10]  Günther Palm,et al.  KI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[11]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[12]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[13]  Yanchun Zhang,et al.  An overview of content-based image retrieval techniques , 2004, 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2004. AINA 2004..

[14]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  Content-based image retrieval systems: A survey , 2000 .

[15]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  International Journal of Computer Vision manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Semantic Modeling of Natural Scenes for Content-Based Image Retrieval , 2022 .

[16]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Image Retrieval through Qualitative Representations over Semantic Features , 2007, BMVC.

[17]  C Psenicka,et al.  Measuring Cluster Similarity across Methods , 2000, Psychological reports.

[18]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Image and Video Retrieval , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  Martin Szummer,et al.  Indoor-outdoor image classification , 1998, Proceedings 1998 IEEE International Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Database.

[20]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  A review on image segmentation techniques , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Aidong Zhang,et al.  Semantics-Based Image Retrieval by Region Saliency , 2002, CIVR.

[22]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  Semantic Image Analysis Using a Learning Approach and Spatial Context , 2006, SAMT.

[23]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Perceptual image similarity experiments , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  Improved scene classification using efficient low-level features and semantic cues , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Semantic Multimedia , 2008, Reasoning Web.

[26]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Using relative spatial relationships to improve individual region recognition , 2005 .

[27]  Peter G. B. Enser,et al.  Towards a Comprehensive Survey of the Semantic Gap in Visual Image Retrieval , 2003, CIVR.

[28]  Reinhold Rauh,et al.  A Cognitive Assessment of Topological Spatial Relations: Results from an Empirical Investigation , 1997, COSIT.

[29]  Paul A. Gore,et al.  11 – Cluster Analysis , 2000 .

[30]  Akifumi Makinouchi,et al.  Semantic Approach to Image Database Classification and Retrieval (「夏のデータベースワークショップ(DBWS2003)」一般) , 2003 .

[31]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[32]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  On image classification: city images vs. landscapes , 1998, Pattern Recognit..