A fundamental comparison of incomplete charge transfer in charge transfer devices

Using a small-signal analysis, we present a general comparison of the more important contributions to the incomplete transfer of charge in the following charge transfer devices: (i) the polyphase charge-coupled device and the IGFET bucket-brigade shift register, where individual charge transfers are single-step processes, and (ii) the two-phase charge-coupled device, the conductively connected charge-coupled device, the tetrode bucket brigade, and the stepped-oxide bucket brigade, where individual charge transfers are two-step processes. A recently proposed lumped-charge-model approximation is made in order to estimate the time dependence of the transferred charge including both drift and diffusion. In this calculation we also include the effects associated with the injection of charge from a diffused source into the IGFET channel which modify the current-voltage behavior at low currents. Using this calculation of the time dependence of the transferred charge, the various contributions to incomplete transfer, including those due to trapping in the interface states, are derived and compared for each of the charge transfer devices of interest.

[1]  C. N. Berglund The bipolar transistor bucket-brigade shift register , 1972 .

[2]  M. F. Tompsett,et al.  Measurements of transfer inefficiency of 250-element undercut-isolated charge coupled devices , 1973 .

[3]  C. N. Berglund,et al.  Fabrication and performance considerations of charge-transfer dynamic shift registers , 1972 .

[4]  R. J. Strain,et al.  B.S.T.J. brief: The buried channel charge coupled device , 1972 .

[5]  H. K. Gummel A charge control relation for bipolar transistors , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[6]  K. K. Thornber,et al.  Incomplete charge transfer in IGFET bucket-brigade shift registers , 1971 .

[7]  W. B. Joyce,et al.  Linearized dispersion relation and green's function for discrete-charge-transfer devices with incomplete transfer , 1971 .

[8]  R. H. Walden,et al.  Implanted‐Barrier Two‐Phase Charge‐Coupled Device , 1971 .

[9]  R. J. Strain Properties of an idealized traveling-wave charge-coupled device , 1972 .

[10]  K. Teer,et al.  Bucket-brigade electronics: new possibilities for delay, time-axis conversion, and scanning , 1969 .

[11]  M. B. Barron Low level currents in insulated gate field effect transistors , 1972 .

[12]  R. J. Strain,et al.  A nonlinear diffusion analysis of charge-coupled-device transfer , 1971 .

[13]  L. G. Heller,et al.  Charge-control method of charge-coupled device transfer analysis , 1972 .

[14]  G. F. Amelio,et al.  Computer modeling of charge-coupled device characteristics , 1972 .

[15]  C. N. Berglund Analog performance limitations of charge-transfer dynamic shift registers , 1971 .

[16]  Dankwart Koehler The charge-control concept in the form of equivalent circuits, representing a link between the classic large signal diode and transistor models , 1967 .

[17]  M. Lenzlinger,et al.  Charge Transfer in Charge‐Coupled Devices , 1971 .

[18]  G. E. Smith,et al.  Charge coupled semiconductor devices , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[19]  Carver A. Mead,et al.  Charge transfer in charge-coupled devices , 1972 .

[20]  J. T. Clemens,et al.  Two‐Phase Stepped Oxide CCD Shift Register Using Undercut Isolation , 1972 .

[21]  Michael F. Tompsett,et al.  The quantitative effects of interface states on the performance of charge-coupled devices , 1973 .

[22]  C. N. Berglund,et al.  Incomplete transfer in charge-transfer devices , 1973 .

[23]  J. R. Brews,et al.  Surface Potential Fluctuations Generated by Interface Charge Inhomogeneities in MOS Devices , 1972 .