Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems

Developing, implementing and assimilating information technologies into organizational practices pose significant technical and social challenges. In this paper, we explore technology use mediation (TUM) processes in two cases of electronic medical record system use in two healthcare organizations. In our analysis, we examine contextual influences on mediation and consider TUM processes and outcomes in projects utilizing modern systems development methods. We found that crucial TUM actions occurred during systems development phases as well as during system use, that mediation was vitally important with these specialized IT artefacts, and that system configuration required changes to software infrastructure and code. Organizational size influenced the availability and the effectiveness of mediation resources; with adequate resources committed to the task, the institutional environment presented substantial, but not insurmountable, challenges to technology use mediation. We consider implications for practice and suggest future research directions.

[1]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[2]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[3]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Analyzing genre of organizational communication in clinical information systems , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Technology-use mediation: making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context , 2003, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[6]  E J Davidson,et al.  Planning and managing computerized order entry: a case study of IT-enabled organizational transformation. , 1999, Topics in health information management.

[7]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Key roles in intranet implementation: the conquest and the aftermath , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Husnayati Hussin,et al.  IT alignment in small firms , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[10]  P. Powell,et al.  Evaluating information systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: issues and evidence , 1998 .

[11]  Antonio Vallecillo,et al.  A Trading Service for COTS Components , 2004, Comput. J..

[12]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[13]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organisational issues in systems development projects , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? , 2003, JAMA.

[15]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Alessandro Bianchi,et al.  Iterative Reengineering of Legacy Systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[19]  D. Light.  Institutional change and healthcare organizations: from professional dominance to managed care , 2002, International Journal of Integrated Care.

[20]  E. Clemons,et al.  Newly Vulnerable Markets in an Age of Pure Information Products: An Analysis of Online Music and Online News , 2002 .

[21]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[22]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Traditional, iterative, and component-based development: A social analysis of software development paradigms , 2001, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[23]  Davis Ej,et al.  Planning and managing computerized order entry: a case study of IT-enabled organizational transformation. , 1999 .

[24]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[25]  Jr. Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.) , 1995 .

[26]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[27]  Hareton K. N. Leung,et al.  On the efficiency of domain-based COTS product selection method , 2002, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[28]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Examining the organizational implications of IT use in hospital-based health care: a case study of computerized order entry , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[29]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  COTS Integration: Plug and Pray? , 1999, Computer.

[33]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[34]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[35]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[36]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice , 1997 .

[37]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  System development conflict during the use of an information systems prototyping method of action research: Implications for practice and research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.