Modeling host-parasite coevolution: a nested approach based on mechanistic models.

In this study we introduce a mechanistic framework for modeling host-parasite coevolution using a nested modeling approach. The first step in this approach is to construct a mechanistic model of the parasite population dynamics within a host. The second step is to define an epidemiological model which is used to derive the fitness functions for both the host and the parasite. The within-host model is then nested within the epidemiological model by linking the epidemiological parameters such as the transmission rate of the infection or the additional host mortality rate to the dynamics of the within-host model. Nesting the within-host model into an epidemiological model allows us to evaluate the fitness functions for each interactor which in turn allows us to determine the coevolutionary dynamics of the system. This nested approach has the advantage over other approaches in that mechanistic descriptions of the host-parasite biology are used to derive, rather than impose, life-history trade-offs. We illustrate this framework by analysing a simple host-parasite system. In this particular system we find that the coevolutionary equilibrium is always stable and that host survivorship and parasite fitness vary greatly with the cost of the immune response and parasite growth.

[1]  K. Pfennig Evolution of pathogen virulence: the role of variation in host phenotype , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  A. Sasaki Host-parasite coevolution in a multilocus gene-for-gene system , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. D. Peters,et al.  The Red Queen and Fluctuating Epistasis: A Population Genetic Analysis of Antagonistic Coevolution , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[4]  M. Boots,et al.  The Evolution of Costly Resistance in Host‐Parasite Systems , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[5]  A. Sasaki,et al.  A model for the coevolution of resistance and virulence in coupled host–parasitoid interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  C. Lively,et al.  THE MAINTENANCE OF SEX BY PARASITISM AND MUTATION ACCUMULATION UNDER EPISTATIC FITNESS FUNCTIONS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  M. Baalen Coevolution of recovery ability and virulence , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Mathematical models of parasite responses to host immune defences , 1997, Parasitology.

[9]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  STATISTICAL TESTS OF HOST‐PARASITE COSPECIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Models of Parasite Virulence , 1996, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sex against virulence: the coevolution of parasitic diseases. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  C. Lively,et al.  Selection by parasites for clonal diversity and mixed mating , 1994 .

[13]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Within-Host Population Dynamics and the Evolution and Maintenance of Microparasite Virulence , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[14]  P. Thrall,et al.  The cost of resistance and the maintenance of genetic polymorphism in host—pathogen systems , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  R. May,et al.  The evolution of virulence in parasites and pathogens: reconciliation between two competing hypotheses. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  S. Frank,et al.  A MODEL OF INDUCIBLE DEFENSE , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Optimal growth schedule of pathogens within a host: switching between lytic and latent cycles. , 1991, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. Nadler,et al.  Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts , 1988, Nature.

[20]  L. Ploeg Control of variant surface antigen switching in trypanosomes , 1987, Cell.

[21]  D. Greaves,et al.  Programmed gene rearrangements altering gene expression. , 1987, Science.

[22]  T. Meyer,et al.  The repertoire of silent pilus genes in neisseria gonorrhoeae: Evidence for gene conversion , 1986, Cell.

[23]  R M May,et al.  Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[25]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Testing the Context and Extent of Host-Parasite Coevolution , 1979 .

[26]  R. May,et al.  Population biology of infectious diseases: Part II , 1979, Nature.

[27]  P. Raven,et al.  BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION , 1964 .

[28]  R. May,et al.  Population Biology of Infectious Diseases , 1982, Dahlem Workshop Reports.