Embedding the New Discipline of Service Science

This chapter presents a conceptual discourse for embedding the new discipline of service science. It argues for service science to be free of paradigmatic research influences of existing disciplines, proposing service science as an integrative discipline of engineering, technological and, social sciences for the purpose of value cocreation with customers. The chapter argues that thinking of a service organisation from a systems perspective will complement the traditional reductionist position and that together they will provide a sound foundation for the discipline of service science. The chapter then goes on to put forward a research agenda for service science, considering five salient issues for knowledge production. The argument for service science knowledge production is located alongside disciplinary knowledge of service, in so doing, suggesting that service science is not a logical development within any discipline and that the time is right for it to emerge into a discipline of its own.

[1]  Steve Evans,et al.  Succeeding through service innovation : a service perspective for education, research, business and government , 2008 .

[2]  Richard C. Anderson How to Construct Achievement Tests to Assess Comprehension , 1972 .

[3]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  A research manifesto for services science , 2006, CACM.

[4]  Uday M. Apte,et al.  A history of research in service operations: What's the big idea? , 2007 .

[5]  E. Cohen,et al.  Boltzmann and Einstein: Statistics and dynamics — An unsolved problem , 2005 .

[6]  Jürgen Klüver The Dynamics and Evolution of Social Systems: New Foundations of a Mathematical Sociology , 2010 .

[7]  Eliyahu M. Goldratt,et al.  Theory of Constraints , 1990 .

[8]  J. Ziman Real Science: What It Is and What It Means , 2000 .

[9]  Peter K. Mills,et al.  Perspectives on the Technology of Service Operations , 1982 .

[10]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The New Frontier of Experience Innovation , 2003 .

[11]  Jay W. Forrester Dynamic models of economic systems and industrial organizations , 2003 .

[12]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Building a New Academic Field-- The Case of Services Marketing , 1993 .

[13]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Value co-creation in the delivery of outcome-based contracts for business-to-business service , 2010 .

[14]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[15]  R. Ramírez Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research , 1999 .

[16]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999, Complex..

[17]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[18]  C. Grönroos The perceived service quality concept – a mistake? , 2001 .

[19]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Editorial Column—Welcome to Our Declaration of Interdependence , 2009 .

[20]  Chun-Hsien Liu,et al.  Revisit service classification to construct a customer‐oriented integrative service model , 2008 .

[21]  Fremont E. Kast,et al.  General Systems Theory: Applications for Organization and Management , 1972 .

[22]  Stephen Brown,et al.  Postmodernism: The End of Marketing? , 1999 .

[23]  Mike P. Papazoglou,et al.  Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues , 2007, The VLDB Journal.

[24]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[25]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Embedding the new discipline of service science: A service science research agenda , 2009, 2009 IEEE/INFORMS International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics.

[26]  J. Manyika,et al.  The next revolution in interactions , 2005 .

[27]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[29]  P. Maglio,et al.  The Emergence of Service Science: Toward Systematic Service Innovations to Accelerate Co‐Creation of Value , 2008 .

[30]  Charles M. Tiebout A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  R. Swinburne OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH , 1973 .

[32]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The General Theory of Second Best , 1956 .

[33]  G. Hamel The Future of Management , 2007 .

[34]  K. Popper Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[35]  Valarie A. Zeithaml,et al.  Services Marketing Strategy , 2010 .

[36]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  B2B performance-based contracts in services : the attributes of value co-creation , 2009 .

[37]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Towards a Benefit-based Framework for Understanding Business to Business Services and its impact on Contract and Capability , 2008 .

[38]  K. Gallagher Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1996 .

[39]  W. Weaver Science and complexity. , 1948, American scientist.

[40]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[41]  I. Ng,et al.  Identifying Risk and its Impact on Contracting Through a Benefit Based-Model Framework in Business to Business contracting : Case of the defence industry , 2009 .

[42]  Linda G. Sprague,et al.  Evolution of the field of operations management , 2007 .

[43]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  A Framework for Cross Disciplinary Efforts in Services Research , 2009 .

[44]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Outcome-based contracting: changing the boundaries of B2B customer relationships: an executive briefing , 2009 .

[45]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge , 2003 .

[46]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[47]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[48]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[49]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[50]  U. Segerstråle,et al.  Real Science. What it is, and what it means , 2001 .

[51]  R. Normann,et al.  From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[52]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation , 2006, CACM.

[53]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  AMPLIFICATION IN SERVICE SUPPLY CHAINS: AN EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY FROM THE TELECOM INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[54]  P. Drucker,et al.  The Future of Management , 2008 .

[55]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Tracking the evolution of the services marketing literature , 1993 .

[56]  Haluk Demirkan,et al.  SERVICE ORIENTED TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY , 2009 .

[57]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[58]  Christian Grönroos,et al.  Service marketing : Nordic School perspectives , 1985 .

[59]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Service Science: Toward a Smarter Planet , 2010 .

[60]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Theory Development in Operations Management , 2008 .

[61]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  The History and State of General Systems Theory , 1972 .

[62]  P. Henle,et al.  The status of emergence , 1942 .

[63]  A. Payne,et al.  Managing the co-creation of value , 2008 .

[64]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[65]  Stafford Beer,et al.  The Viable System Model : its provenance , development , methodology and pathology * Stafford Beer = President of the World Organization for Systems and Cybernetics , 2000 .

[66]  David A. Tansik,et al.  The Customer Contact Model for Organization Design , 1983 .

[67]  Irene C. L. Ng Service transformation and the new landscape of performance-based contracting: an executive briefing , 2008 .

[68]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Service science: Catalyst for change in business school curricula , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[69]  G. Weinberg An Introduction to General Systems Thinking , 1975 .