Health technology assessment and policy from the economic perspective

This article comments on the four country papers in this volume from an economic perspective. Different phases of the decision-making process, which can be supported by Health Technology Assessment (HTA), are considered. For each of these, there is large cross-country variation in the way in which HTA influences policy. Furthermore, economic themes regarding the relevance of HTA evidence for policy making, the position of cost-effectiveness in relation to other criteria vis-à-vis reimbursement decisions, the use of a cost per quality-adjusted life year threshold, and the incorporation of economic considerations in practice guidelines are discussed.

[1]  D. Banta,et al.  EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Coverage , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[2]  S. Hill,et al.  Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. , 2000, JAMA.

[3]  D. Banta,et al.  Report from the EUR-ASSESS Project , 1995, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  J. V. van Busschbach,et al.  How to define a basic package of health services for a tax funded or social insurance based health care system? , 2001, European Journal of Health Economics.

[5]  H. Banta,et al.  A History of ISTAHC: A Personal Perspective on Its First 10 Years , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.