Cigarette smoking and electronic cigarette vaping patterns as a function of e-cigarette flavourings

Introduction The present study examined the influence of flavouring on the smoking and vaping behaviour of cigarette smokers asked to adopt e-cigarettes for a period of 6 weeks. Methods Participants were 88 current male and female smokers with no intention to stop smoking, but who agreed to substitute e-cigarettes for their current cigarettes. On intake, participants were administered tests of taste and smell for e-cigarettes flavoured with tobacco, menthol, cherry and chocolate, and were given a refillable e-cigarette of their preferred flavour or a control flavour. Participants completed daily logs of cigarette and e-cigarette use and were followed each week. Results Analyses over days indicated that, during the 6-week e-cigarette period, cigarette smoking rates dropped from an average of about 16 to about 7 cigarettes/day. e-Cigarette flavour had a significant effect such that the largest drop in cigarette smoking occurred among those assigned menthol e-cigarettes, and the smallest drop in smoking occurred among those assigned chocolate and cherry flavours. e-Cigarette vaping rates also differed significantly by flavour assigned, with the highest vaping rates for tobacco- and cherry-flavoured e-cigarettes, and the lowest rates for those assigned to chocolate. Conclusions The findings suggest that adoption of e-cigarettes in smokers may influence smoking rates and that e-cigarette flavourings can moderate this effect. e-Cigarette vaping rates are also influenced by flavourings. These findings may have implications for the utility of e-cigarettes as a nicotine replacement device and for the regulation of flavourings in e-cigarettes for harm reduction.

[1]  B. Green,et al.  Sensory Effects of Menthol and Nicotine in an E-Cigarette. , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[2]  Elizabeth G Klein,et al.  Online E-cigarette Marketing Claims: A Systematic Content and Legal Analysis. , 2016, Tobacco regulatory science.

[3]  Mary J Gowin,et al.  Electronic Cigarette Use in Straight-to-Work Young Adults. , 2016, American journal of health behavior.

[4]  C. Berg Preferred flavors and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers , 2016, International Journal of Public Health.

[5]  C. Schoenborn,et al.  Electronic Cigarette Use Among Adults: United States, 2014. , 2015, NCHS data brief.

[6]  Jessica M Yingst,et al.  Development of a questionnaire for assessing dependence on electronic cigarettes among a large sample of ex-smoking E-cigarette users. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[7]  Brian A. King,et al.  Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[8]  M. Kegler,et al.  Cigarette users' interest in using or switching to electronic nicotine delivery systems for smokeless tobacco for harm reduction, cessation, or novelty: a cross-sectional survey of US adults. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[9]  J. Samet,et al.  Flavorings in electronic cigarettes: an unrecognized respiratory health hazard? , 2014, JAMA.

[10]  M. Kegler,et al.  Attitudes toward E-Cigarettes, Reasons for Initiating E-Cigarette Use, and Changes in Smoking Behavior after Initiation: A Pilot Longitudinal Study of Regular Cigarette Smokers , 2014, Open journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Anthony Gamst,et al.  Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[12]  D. Abrams,et al.  Noncombustible tobacco product advertising: how companies are selling the new face of tobacco. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[13]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Impact of Flavour Variability on Electronic Cigarette Use Experience: An Internet Survey , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  Hayden McRobbie,et al.  Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[15]  Amarda Shehu,et al.  Menthol Binding and Inhibition of α7-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Kelvin Choi,et al.  Young adults' favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[17]  Jennifer L. Pearson,et al.  e-Cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[18]  D. Swandulla,et al.  Menthol Suppresses Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Functioning in Sensory Neurons via Allosteric Modulation , 2012, Chemical senses.

[19]  J. Foulds,et al.  Electronic cigarettes (e‐cigs): views of aficionados and clinical/public health perspectives , 2011, International journal of clinical practice.

[20]  L. Signorello,et al.  Lung cancer risk among smokers of menthol cigarettes. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Robert J McDermott,et al.  Waterpipe (hookah) tobacco smoking among youth. , 2011, Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care.

[22]  Jean-François Etter,et al.  Electronic cigarettes: a survey of users , 2010, BMC public health.

[23]  H McRobbie,et al.  Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[24]  Caryn Lerman,et al.  Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[25]  D. Roth,et al.  Agreement between prospective interactive voice response self-monitoring and structured retrospective reports of drinking and contextual variables during natural resolution attempts. , 2007, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[26]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Mentholated Cigarette Smoking Inhibits Nicotine Metabolism , 2004, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[27]  L. Marks,et al.  Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[28]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[29]  Disease Prevention Clearing the Smoke : Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction , 2001 .

[30]  F. Zufall,et al.  The cellular and molecular basis of odor adaptation. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[31]  P. Dalton Psychophysical and behavioral characteristics of olfactory adaptation. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[32]  W. Miller,et al.  The reliability of Form 90: an instrument for assessing alcohol treatment outcome. , 1997, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[33]  R L Stout,et al.  Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. , 1994, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[34]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  Nicotine addiction and its assessment. , 1990, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[35]  L C Sobell,et al.  Reliability of a timeline method: assessing normal drinkers' reports of recent drinking and a comparative evaluation across several populations. , 1988, British journal of addiction.

[36]  Richard A. Brown,et al.  Distress tolerance and duration of past smoking cessation attempts. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.