Influence of Diaphragm Flexibility on Seismic Response of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

The effects of diaphragm flexibility on the seismic response of low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings are examined using one-way stiffness- and strength-eccentric single-story systems subjected to unidirectional ground excitation. A wide range of diaphragm stiffnesses are considered. Results show that diaphragm flexibility can induce different effects depending on the configuration of the system and the level of diaphragm flexibility. When diaphragm is relatively stiff, amplified displacement demands can be imposed on the flexible side of the structure. When diaphragm is relatively flexible, peak displacements of in-plane loaded walls generally reduce. A diaphragm classification is developed to capture these salient effects.

[1]  Iztok Peruš,et al.  On the inelastic torsional response of single‐storey structures under bi‐axial excitation , 2005 .

[2]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2014 .

[3]  Jaime De-la-Colina.  In-plane floor flexibility effects on torsionally unbalanced systems , 1999 .

[4]  Serena Cattari,et al.  TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2013 .

[5]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of structures , 2007 .

[6]  Shen-Haw Ju,et al.  Comparison of Building Analyses Assuming Rigid or Flexible Floors , 2000 .

[7]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the In-Plane Stiffness of Timber Diaphragms , 2012 .

[8]  Daniel P. Abrams,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Structures with Flexible Diaphragms , 1996 .

[9]  Guido Magenes,et al.  The Effect of Stiffened Floor and Roof Diaphragms on the Experimental Seismic Response of a Full-Scale Unreinforced Stone Masonry Building , 2014 .

[10]  Elizabeth Vintzileou,et al.  Seismic behavior of three-leaf stone masonry buildings before and after interventions: Shaking table tests on a two-storey masonry model , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[11]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Analytical models for low-rise buildings with flexible floor diaphragms , 1985 .

[12]  Donald W. White,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of a one-story low-rise masonry building with a flexible diaphragm subjected to seismic excitation , 2004 .

[13]  Vladimir Sigmund,et al.  Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings , 2010 .

[14]  Dong-Guen Lee,et al.  Effects of inplane floor slab flexibility on the seismic behaviour of building structures , 1994 .

[15]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Shaking Table Test of a Strengthened Full-Scale Stone Masonry Building with Flexible Diaphragms , 2014 .

[16]  Anil K. Agrawal,et al.  Seismic performance of flexible timber diaphragms: Damping, force–displacement and natural period , 2015 .

[17]  Pierre Quenneville,et al.  Natural Period and Seismic Idealization of Flexible Timber Diaphragms , 2013 .

[18]  A. Penna.  Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[19]  Hassan S. Saffarini,et al.  In-Plane Floor Deformations in RC Structures , 1992 .

[20]  N. Null.  Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings , 2014 .

[21]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  In‐plane seismic response of brick masonry walls , 1997 .

[22]  Roberto Tomasi,et al.  Field Testing of Flexible Timber Diaphragms in an Existing Vintage URM Building , 2015 .

[23]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Quantifying the seismic response of structures with flexible diaphragms , 2012 .

[24]  Robert B. Fleischman,et al.  Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral‐system structures with flexible diaphragms , 2001 .