Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE)
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ecological knowledge and North Sea environmental policies , 2016 .
[2] Robert T. Lackey,et al. Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[3] Martin J Buxton,et al. The utilisation of health research in policy-making : concepts , examples and methods of assessment , 2003 .
[4] Lisa Dilling,et al. Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science , 2007 .
[5] R R Brown,et al. Capacity attributes of future urban water management regimes: projections from Australian sustainability practitioners. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[6] F. V. D. Molen,et al. The interplay between knowledge and governance: Insights from the governance of recreational boating in the Dutch Wadden Sea area, 1981-2014 , 2016 .
[7] K. O'Toole,et al. Analysis of operating environments: A diagnostic model for linking science, society and policy for sustainability , 2014 .
[8] J. Edelenbos,et al. Knowledge governance for ecosystem-based management: Understanding its context-dependency , 2016 .
[9] S. Straus,et al. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.
[10] Pita Spruijt,et al. Differences in views of experts about their role in particulate matter policy advice: Empirical evidence from an international expert consultation , 2016 .
[11] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany , 2016 .
[12] J. Vucetich,et al. On Advocacy by Environmental Scientists: What, Whether, Why, and How , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[13] K. Charmaz,et al. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.
[14] David W. Cash,et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] M. Schwartz,et al. Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge–Action Boundary , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[16] Juliette Young,et al. Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European Network of Knowledge , 2015 .
[17] Beyond Advocacy: Making Space for Conservation Scientists in Public Debate , 2016 .
[18] C. Pahl-Wostl,et al. Societal Learning Needed to Face the Water Challenge , 2011, AMBIO.
[19] J. V. Tatenhove,et al. Uncertainties in the assessment of “significant effect” on the Dutch Natura 2000 Wadden Sea site – The mussel seed fishery and powerboat race controversies , 2016 .
[20] Lisa Robins,et al. A model for knowledge transfer and adoption: a systemic approach to science communication , 2006 .
[21] Gerben Janse,et al. Communication between forest scientists and forest policy-makers in Europe — A survey on both sides of the science/policy interface , 2008 .
[22] Simo Sarkki,et al. Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces , 2015 .
[23] Alan Grainger,et al. Designing a new science-policy communication mechanism for the UN Convention to Combat Desertification , 2016 .
[24] E. McNie. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .
[25] R. K. Neumann,et al. Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities , 2015 .
[26] Art Dewulf,et al. What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity , 2016 .
[27] Kathryn Oliver,et al. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[28] Lisa Dilling,et al. Unpacking the 'information barrier': comparing perspectives on information as a barrier to climate change adaptation in the interior mountain West. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.
[29] J. Lyytimäki,et al. Knowledge brokerage context factors – What matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment? , 2015 .
[30] R. Kasperson,et al. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research , 2010 .
[31] J. Creswell. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .
[32] A. K. Bregt,et al. A Special Section entitled “Challenges to and opportunities for biodiversity science-policy interfaces” , 2015 .
[33] B. Head,et al. Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges , 2010 .
[34] P. Driessen,et al. Towards productive science-policy interfaces : A research agenda , 2014 .
[35] L. Dilling,et al. Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy , 2011 .
[36] P. Gluckman. The science–policy interface , 2016, Science.
[37] S. Hove,et al. Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces , 2014 .
[38] Joshua Newman,et al. Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service , 2017 .