Body Location Independent Activity Monitoring

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is increasingly common in people’s daily lives, being applied in health areas, sports and safety. Because of their high computational power, small size and low cost, smartphones and wearable sensors are suitable to monitor user’s daily living activities. However, almost all existing systems require devices to be worn in certain positions, making them impractical for long-term activity monitoring, where a change in position can lead to less accurate results. This work describes a novel algorithm to detect human activity independent of the sensor placement. Taking into account the battery consumption, only two sensors were considered: the accelerometer (ACC) and the barometer (BAR), with a sample frequency of 30 and 5 Hz, respectively. The signals obtained were then divided into 5 seconds windows. The dataset used is composed of 25 subjects, with more than 7 hours of recording. Daily living activities were performed with the smartphone worn in 12 different positions. From each window a set of statistical, temporal and spectral features were extracted and selected. During the classification process, a decision tree was trained and evaluated using a leave one user out cross validation. The developed framework achieved an accuracy of 94.5±6.8 %, regardless the subject and device’s position. This solution may be applied to elderly monitoring, as a rehabilitation tool in physiotherapy fields and also to be used by ordinary users, who just want to check their daily level of physical activity.

[1]  S. Cerutti,et al.  Barometric Pressure and Triaxial Accelerometry-Based Falls Event Detection , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Azeem J. Khan,et al.  Barometric phone sensors: more hype than hope! , 2014, HotMobile.

[4]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[5]  Na Li,et al.  Implementation of a Real-Time Human Activity Classifier Using a Triaxial Accelerometer and Smartphone , 2013 .

[6]  Muhammad Usman Ilyas,et al.  Activity recognition using smartphone sensors , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC).

[7]  Inês Prata Machado,et al.  Human Activity Data Discovery based on Accelerometry , 2013 .

[8]  Mevlut Ture,et al.  Using Kaplan-Meier analysis together with decision tree methods (C&RT, CHAID, QUEST, C4.5 and ID3) in determining recurrence-free survival of breast cancer patients , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Joana Raquel,et al.  Smartphone Based Human Activity Prediction , 2013 .

[10]  Ana Luísa Gonçalves Neves Gomes,et al.  Human activity recognition with accelerometry: novel time and frequency features , 2014 .

[11]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes , 2010, TOSN.

[12]  A Moncada-Torres,et al.  Activity classification based on inertial and barometric pressure sensors at different anatomical locations , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[13]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[14]  Bing He,et al.  Movement prediction using accelerometers in a human population. , 2016, Biometrics.

[15]  Sotiris B. Kotsiantis,et al.  Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques , 2007, Informatica.

[16]  Maxim Grankin,et al.  Research of MEMS accelerometers features in mobile phone , 2012, 2012 12th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT).

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Feature extraction methods for character recognition-A survey , 1996, Pattern Recognit..