Spatial justice and criminal victimization

Spatial variation in crime rates generally has been attributed to differences in culture, economic status, and the social organization of communities. Rarely have policies and practices of criminal justice professionals been examined as causes of this variation. If these policies and practices do place citizens at a higher risk of victimization, a sense of fairness requires that all communities in a region share equally in this increase. This article examines the spatial justice resulting from sentencing practices in Pennsylvania. It demonstrates that certain locations in Philadelphia bear an unequal burden because of these practices. The relatively high crime rates of these areas are due partly to decisions made by criminal justice professionals.

[1]  W. Skogan.  Community Organizations and Crime , 1988, Crime and Justice.

[2]  J. H. Kramer,et al.  Pennsylvania's Sentencing Reform: The Impact of Commission-Established Guidelines , 1985 .

[3]  R. Johnston,et al.  Geography and inequality , 1977 .

[4]  R. Rich.  Equity and Institutional Design in Urban Service Delivery , 1977 .

[5]  Simon Hakim,et al.  Metropolitan Crime Patterns , 1986 .

[6]  J. Petersilia,et al.  Prison versus Probation in California , 1986 .

[7]  W. Rohe,et al.  Informal citizen action and crime prevention at the neighborhood level : executive summary , 1985 .

[8]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Patterns in Crime , 1984 .

[9]  P. Eberts,et al.  Metropolitan Crime Rates and Relative Deprivation , 1968 .

[10]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .

[11]  A. Blumstein,et al.  Demographically disaggregated projections of prison populations , 1980 .

[12]  Susan J. Smith.  Victimisation in the Inner City: A British Case Study , 1982 .

[13]  Electronic jails: A new criminal justice concern , 1985 .

[14]  D. M. Smith.  THE GEOGRAPHY OF SOCIAL WELL-BEING , 1974 .

[15]  Judith R. Blau,et al.  The Cost of Inequality: Metropolitan Structure and Violent Crime , 1982 .

[16]  J. Mullen.  Corrections and the Private Sector , 1985 .

[17]  Keith D. Harries,et al.  Crime and the environment , 1980 .

[18]  B. McCarthy.  Intermediate punishments : intensive supervision, home confinement, and electronic surveillance , 1987 .

[19]  Stuart Lottier,et al.  Distribution of Criminal Offenses in Sectional Regions , 1938 .

[20]  Richard M. Titus.  Residential Burglary and the Community Response , 1984 .

[21]  K. Haynes,et al.  Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models , 1985 .

[22]  Elliott Currie,et al.  Confronting crime : an American challenge , 1985 .

[23]  S L Boggs,et al.  Urban crime patterns. , 1965, American sociological review.

[24]  S. Kobrin,et al.  Community Careers in Crime , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[25]  A. Reiss,,et al.  Why Are Communities Important in Understanding Crime? , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[26]  Dennis P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literature , 1988 .

[27]  Susan J. Smith.  Crime, Space, And Society , 1986 .

[28]  J. Wilson,et al.  BROKEN WINDOWS: THE POLICE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SAFETY , 1982 .

[29]  Partial justice;: A study of bias in sentencing , 1974 .