Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Affordances and Institutional Logics in IS-enabled Organisational Sustainability Transformations

While many studies have addressed encouraging employees’ pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) in the workplace, the roles of structures and institutions have received little attention and thus remain unclear. We draw on the concept of affordances as being enacted and embedded in institutional logics, which provide a frame of reference for individual and organisational behaviours. Given our emphasis on organisational sustainability transformations, we explain how organisations can encourage their employees to act pro-environmentally in the workplace with the help of green information systems (Green IS). We address technological, organisational, and human factors that strengthen PEB. Thus, we respond to the call to bring together institutional logics and affordance theory. We present preliminary findings of 55 semi structured interviews with informants from 20 companies, along with internal and external documents. This allows us to develop a pro-environmental corporate logic, which guides employees’ PEB in our case companies. These preliminary findings allow us to develop a research agenda on the interplay of this institutional logic and motivational affordances. We conclude with an outlook on how to tackle the emerging research questions.

[1]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory , 2010 .

[2]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  Les passions de l'ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Arnold Picot,et al.  Why are consumers going green? the role of environmental concerns in private green-IS adoption , 2011, ECIS.

[4]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  A Review of Determinants of and Interventions for Proenvironmental Behaviors in Organizations , 2012 .

[5]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[6]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community , 2010, MIS Q..

[8]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Green IS: Concepts and Issues for Information Systems Research , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[10]  S. Banerjee Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations , 2001 .

[11]  Joel Bothello,et al.  Evolving Conceptualizations of Organizational Environmentalism: A Path Generation Account , 2018 .

[12]  Raymond De Young,et al.  New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior , 2000 .

[13]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  From the Critics' Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System , 2005 .

[15]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[16]  David Hinds,et al.  Engaging Group E-Learning in Virtual Worlds , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Tom Butler,et al.  SIGGreen Pre-ICIS 2015 Workshop Socio-technical Transitions Towards Environmental Sustainability through Green ICT , 2015 .

[18]  Tom Butler,et al.  Environmental responsibilty and green IT: An institutional perspective , 2009, ECIS.

[19]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[20]  Jan Recker,et al.  Principles for Re-Designing Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability , 2016, WITFOR.

[21]  Marina Fiedler,et al.  Greening the Organisation: An Institutional Logics Approach to Corporate Pro-environmentalism , 2017 .

[22]  Jacqueline Corbett,et al.  Unmasking Corporate Sustainability at the Project Level: Exploring the Influence of Institutional Logics and Individual Agency , 2018 .

[23]  Jan Recker,et al.  IT-enabled Sustainability Transformation - the Case of SAP , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[25]  Kenneth Wm. Kury,et al.  Institutional Logics and Institutional Change in Organizations: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing , 2005 .

[26]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[27]  Luc G. Pelletier,et al.  Why Are You Doing Things for the Environment? The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES)1 , 1998 .

[28]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[29]  Leona Chandra Kruse,et al.  Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations , 2018, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  T. Reay,et al.  Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics , 2009 .

[31]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics , 2013 .

[32]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[33]  Siu Hing Lo,et al.  Only reasoned action? An interorganizational study of energy-saving behaviors in office buildings , 2014 .

[34]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT-Associated Organizational Change Processes , 2013, MIS Q..

[35]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems , 2013, MIS Q..

[36]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems Solutions for Environmental Sustainability: How Can We Do More? , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[38]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[39]  U. Flick,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis , 2013 .

[40]  Marina Fiedler,et al.  The Role of Motivational Affordances and Institutional Logics in IS-enabled Organizational Sustainability Transformations - A Research Agenda , 2016 .

[41]  P. Drucker What executives should remember. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[42]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Attitudes and Recycling: Does the Measurement of Affect Enhance Behavioral Prediction? , 1994 .

[43]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics , 2008 .

[44]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use , 2010, MIS Q..

[45]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Toward a positive design theory: Principles for designing motivating information and communication technology , 2008 .

[46]  Jan Recker,et al.  Enablers and Barriers to the Organizational Adoption of Sustainable Business Practices , 2010, AMCIS.

[47]  Anol Bhattacherjee Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices , 2012 .

[48]  Bengisu Tulu,et al.  A Theory of Organization-EHR Affordance Actualization , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Min-Dong Paul Lee,et al.  Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[50]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[51]  C. Kormos,et al.  Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions , 2011 .

[52]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Green projects: An information drives analysis of four cases , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2012 .

[54]  Jaco Lok Institutional Logics as Identity Projects , 2010 .

[55]  Guy Paré,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Livio D. DeSimone,et al.  Eco‐Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[57]  L. Steg,et al.  Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior , 2007 .

[58]  Nigel P. Melville,et al.  Spurring impactful research on information systems for environmental sustainability , 2013 .

[59]  Kent Marett,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Benefits and Institutional Influences on the Continued Use of Environmentally Munificent Bypass Systems in Long-Haul Trucking , 2013, MIS Q..

[60]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[61]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[62]  Jan Recker,et al.  Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations , 2013, MIS Q..

[63]  D. Vallero,et al.  The Sustainability Imperative , 2008 .

[64]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Gamification , 2013, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[65]  Marina Fiedler,et al.  The linkage between human resource practices and organizational ambidexterity: An analysis of internal labor market dynamics in a port-of-entry context , 2013 .

[66]  Chulmo Koo,et al.  Smart energy: where do we stand and where should we go? , 2015, Electron. Mark..

[67]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems Green Information Systems: Directives for the Is Discipline Recommended Citation Green Information Systems: Directives for the Is Discipline , 2022 .

[68]  Frédéric Thiesse,et al.  Motivating Energy-Efficient Behavior with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults , 2013, MIS Q..

[69]  J. Wincent,et al.  THE NATURE AND EXPERIENCE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL PASSION , 2009 .

[70]  P. Strong,et al.  The case for qualitative research , 1992 .

[71]  Marina Fiedler,et al.  How to become a Sustainability Leader? The Role of IS Affordances in Enabling and Triggering Sustainability Transformations , 2017, ICIS.

[72]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Behavior : An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing , 2000 .

[73]  Tom Butler,et al.  Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[74]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: Insights from Uppsala , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications , 2014 .

[76]  G. Currie,et al.  Institutional Complexity and Individual Responses: Delineating the Boundaries of Partial Autonomy , 2017 .

[77]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Toward "Third Wave" Information Systems Research: Linking Sociomaterial Practice with Broader Institutional Logics , 2013, ICIS.