Impact of PSA Screening on the Incidence of Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance Modeling Approach

Background and objective. Both the detection and the treatment of prostate cancer have undergone important clinical advances. Simultaneously, both distant stage incidence and disease-specific mortality have fallen in the United States. A recent study suggests that if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing explains the decline in distant stage incidence, then it may be largely responsible for the decline in mortality. The objective was to quantify this link between PSA screening and the decline in distant stage incidence. Methods. A fixed-cohort simulation model of prostate cancer progression and screening was adapted to a population-based model that integrates new data on trends in testing and biopsy practices. The model was calibrated to pre-PSA incidence and then screening was superimposed, obtaining incidence projections in the absence and presence of testing. This approach permits calculation of clinically relevant measures for model validation and direct assessment of the role of testing in the distant stage incidence decline. Results. The model validated well with prior studies of natural history, and the sensitivity analysis indicated that the findings were robust to variation in model parameters. Model results indicate that PSA screening accounts for approximately 80% of the observed decline in distant stage incidence. Conclusions. PSA screening contributed to the observed declines in distant stage incidence and mortality in the 1990s. However, additional factors, such as increasing awareness of prostate cancer and advances in treatment, have probably also played a role in these trends.

[1]  A Tsodikov,et al.  A population model of prostate cancer incidence , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Lurdes Y T Inoue,et al.  Combining longitudinal studies of PSA. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[3]  J. Donovan,et al.  Does current evidence justify prostate cancer screening in Europe? , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[4]  E. Feuer,et al.  Asymptomatic incidence and duration of prostate cancer. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  M. Cowen,et al.  Serial prostate specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a computer model evaluates competing strategies. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Cowen,et al.  A Markov model of the natural history of prostate cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  E. Feuer,et al.  Modeling the impact of the decline in distant stage disease on prostate carcinoma mortality rates , 2002, Cancer.

[8]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Estimating Lead Time and Overdiagnosis Associated with PSA Screening from Prostate Cancer Incidence Trends , 2008, Biometrics.

[9]  P. Walsh,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Michael J Barry,et al.  Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  D. Johnston,et al.  A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[13]  M. Stampfer,et al.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[14]  Barnett S Kramer,et al.  Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[15]  C G Chute,et al.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. , 1993, JAMA.

[16]  M. Barry Revisiting my personal decision about prostate‐specific antigen testing in 2005 , 2005, BJU international.

[17]  E. Feuer,et al.  An ecologic study of prostate-specific antigen screening and prostate cancer mortality in nine geographic areas of the United States. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  P. Albertsen What is the value of screening for prostate cancer in the US? , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[19]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Long-term effects of finasteride on prostate specific antigen levels: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[20]  E. Feuer,et al.  Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part III: Quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Peter Müller,et al.  Modeling Disease Progression With Longitudinal Markers , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[22]  E. Feuer,et al.  Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey , 2007, Cancer.

[23]  K. Shinohara,et al.  The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[24]  Jacques Bernier,et al.  Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.