Comparing different support schemes for renewable electricity in the scope of an energy systems analysis

The present analysis illustrates how energy system models can play an important role in the long-term evaluation of support schemes for renewable electricity. Methodological approaches for the explicit representation of such instruments are presented both for price-based and quantity-based systems. In the subsequent scenario comparison, the current German feed-in tariffs (FIT) are contrasted with several alternative support mechanisms. With the current scheme, renewable generation is increased to almost 46% of gross electricity consumption in 2020 and 54% in 2030 associated with a rise in the surcharge on consumer electricity prices of 40% between 2011 and 2020. By switching to a technology–neutral certificate system which promotes only the most cost-efficient generation and adheres to the political targets renewable generation costs could be lowered by more than €200 billion between 2013 and 2030. At the same time, it has to be kept in mind that technology–neutral systems tend to cause a higher cost burden for electricity consumers. The greatest cost reduction can be achieved under a technology-specific quantity-based system with a decrease in cumulated FIT differential costs of €68 billion and of €416 billion in total energy system costs between 2013 and 2030 compared to the current system.

[1]  Richard Green,et al.  Support Schemes for Renewable Energy: An Economic Analysis , 2012 .

[2]  Philippe Menanteau,et al.  Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy , 2003 .

[3]  R. Schmalensee Evaluating Policies to Increase the Generation of Electricity from Renewable Energy , 2011 .

[4]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  Role of energy efficiency standards in reducing CO2 emissions in Germany: An assessment with TIMES , 2007 .

[5]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  Application: Scenario analysis with the TIMES-D model. Report on Work Package C of the ETSAP Project “Integrating policy instruments into the TIMES Model” , 2013 .

[6]  Dominik Möst,et al.  Renewable energy sources in European energy supply and interactions with emission trading , 2010 .

[7]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[8]  Tom Kober,et al.  Auswirkungen veränderter Laufzeiten für Kernkraftwerke in Deutschland – Szenarioanalysen bis zum Jahr 2035 , 2011 .

[9]  J. Sawin,et al.  National Policy Instruments - Policy Lessons for the Advancement & Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technologies Around the World , 2004 .

[10]  Nuclear Safety,et al.  Energy concept for an environmentally sound, reliable and affordable energy supply. , 2010 .

[11]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC , 2005 .

[12]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  The explicit modelling of support systems for renewable electricity in TIMES. Report on Work Package B-1 of the ETSAP Project “Integrating policy instruments into the TIMES Model” , 2012 .

[13]  Molly Espey,et al.  Turning on the Lights: A Meta-Analysis of Residential Electricity Demand Elasticities , 2004, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[14]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  The representation of emission trading schemes in national energy system models. Report on Work Package B-2 of the ETSAP Project “Integrating policy instruments into the TIMES Model” , 2012 .

[15]  Tom Kober,et al.  Die Entwicklung der Energiemärkte bis 2030, Energieprognose 2009. Untersuchung im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) durch das Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER), Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Zent , 2010 .

[16]  D. Kamerschen,et al.  The demand for residential, industrial and total electricity, 1973-1998 , 2004 .

[17]  Karsten Neuhoff,et al.  Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development , 2008 .

[18]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia , 2011 .

[19]  Y. Gagnon,et al.  An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment , 2010 .

[20]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  Die Entwicklung der Energiemärkte bis 2030 - Energieprognose 2009 , 2010 .

[21]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Assessment and optimisation of renewable energy support schemes in the European electricity market , 2007 .

[22]  Uwe Remme,et al.  Zukünftige Rolle erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland : Sensitivitätsanalysen mit einem linearen Optimierungsmodell , 2006 .

[23]  Russell Smyth,et al.  Electricity consumption in G7 countries: A panel cointegration analysis of residential demand elasticities , 2007 .