Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as a function of number of CS-UCS pairings.

Four experiments examined the possibility that the outcome of simultaneous and backward fear conditioning procedures might depend upon the number of CS-UCS pairings. A punishment procedure will rats as subjects and shock as the UCS was used; the amount of suppression produced by response-contingent CS presentations indexed the strength of acquired fear. Experiments 1, 3, and 4 examined the suppressive tendencies of simultaneous-and backward-trained CSs after 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 pairings. The pattern of data suggested that initial pairings have the effect of increasing suppressive tendencies of the CS, while subsequent pairings decrease them. In addition, evidence of fear inhibition was found after 160 pairings in the case of the backward paradigm. Experiment 2 examined several nonassociative accounts based upon differential shock exposure. Groups given 10 pairings or 80 pairings were compared to ggroups given 10 pairings plus 70 shock-alone presentations. The results indicated that number of pairings, rather than number of UCS occurrences, is the important factor in decreasing the initial suppression. The evidence for eventual inhibition in the backward paradigm suggests that this occurs through the acquisition of inhibitory tendencies which are antagonistic to the previously conditioned excitation.

[1]  R. Rescorla Informational Variables in Pavlovian Conditioning , 1972 .

[2]  Champion Ra Stimulus-response contiguity in classical aversive conditioning. , 1962 .

[3]  G. Kimble,et al.  Effect of a simultaneous conditioning procedure upon subsequent extinction and acquistion. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Observations on strictly simultaneous conditioned reflexes. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  W. Grings,et al.  Backward conditioning: a replication with emphasis on conceptualizations by the subject. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R. Rescorla Effect of US habituation following conditioning. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Backward conditioning to a CS following an expected vs. a surprising UCS , 1975 .

[8]  R. A. Champion,et al.  Foward, backward, and pseudoconditioning of the GSR. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  D. Reberg Compound tests for excitation in early acquisition and after prolonged extinction of conditioned suppression , 1972 .

[10]  B. Campbell,et al.  Punishment and aversive behavior , 1969 .

[11]  J. H. Curtis,et al.  Learning Theory and Behavior , 1960 .

[12]  R. Rescorla Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. , 1967, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Denny,et al.  Relaxation Theory and Experiments , 1971 .

[14]  William J. Mahoney One trial simultaneous conditioning. , 1975 .

[15]  G. Kimble,et al.  Hilgard and Marquis' Conditioning and learning , 1961 .

[16]  W. N. Kellogg,et al.  The backward conditioning curve. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  Satoru Nishizawa,et al.  SOME ACQUIRED PROPERTIES OF THE BACKWARD CS PAIRED WITH ELECTRIC SHOCK AS US (2):EFFECT OF THE LEVEL OF CONDITIONING , 1963 .

[18]  R. Solomon,et al.  An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. , 1974, Psychological review.

[19]  V. Lolordo,et al.  Role of safety in the Pavlovian backward fear conditioning procedure. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  Heith Cd,et al.  Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning in the rat. , 1973 .

[21]  H S HOFFMAN,et al.  A relay sequencing device for scrambling grid shock. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  J. Konorski Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. , 1948 .

[23]  Joseph D. Allen,et al.  The development of a conditioned positive reinforcer based upon the termination of shock , 1964 .

[24]  M. Oh,et al.  Contiguity vs. drive-reduction in conditioned fear: temporal variations in conditioned and unconditioned stimulus. , 1954 .

[25]  Y. Matsumiya THE EFFECTS OF US INTENSITY AND CS-US PATTERN ON CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE , 1960 .

[26]  I. Pavlov,et al.  Lectures on conditioned reflexes , 1928 .

[27]  The inhibitory effect of backward conditioning as a function of the number of backward pairings , 1974 .

[28]  M. Domjan,et al.  Backward conditoning as an inhibitory procedure , 1971 .

[29]  L. Kamin,et al.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[30]  J. Cautela THE PROBLEM OF BACKWARD CONDITIONING. , 1965, The Journal of psychology.