The sustainable fibres of generative expectation management: The “building with hemp” case study.

This chapter accounts for an emerging logic underpinning the governance of innovation at the level of socio-technological regimes facing expectations and promises for emerging industries. Beyond the scientific literature on management of R&D resources, IP rights and core competences, we question the governance of innovation when it consists in managing the dual expansion of expectations (value landscape, creation of new visions and new interests, etc.) and the realisation of those expectations in organisational arrangements at the niche level. This chapter shows that generative expectation management is clearly based on innovative design activities, i.e. on the capacity to create and refine many possible futu res within research processes and socio-technical arrangements. It suggests that efficient generative expectation management would benefit from tools and processes able to support innovative design processes.

[1]  Franck Aggeri,et al.  Environmental policies and innovation: A knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches , 1999 .

[2]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[3]  Michael M. Hopkins,et al.  Towards a method for evaluating technological expectations: Revealing uncertainty in gene silencing technology discourse , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[4]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[5]  Franck Aggeri,et al.  Environnement et pilotage de l'innovation : un modèle dynamique du développement durable : le cas du recyclage automobile , 1998 .

[6]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[7]  G. L. S. Shackle Expectation in Economics , 1949 .

[8]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .

[9]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[10]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[11]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Characterizing the emergence of a technological field: Expectations, agendas and networks in Lab-on-a-chip technologies , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[12]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[13]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[15]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitativeresearch [Glaser, 1968] , 1968 .

[16]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Strategy as innovative design : an emerging perspective , 2010 .

[17]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[18]  John Grin,et al.  “Doing” Reflexive Modernization in Pig Husbandry , 2008 .

[19]  B. Latour Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[20]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[21]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[22]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  Towards a New Logic for Front End Management: From Drug Discovery to Drug Design in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2007 .

[23]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[24]  Marc Barbier,et al.  The Dynamics of the French Hemp System and Its Stakeholders , 2007 .

[25]  Arie Rip,et al.  Expectations in technological developments. Prospective structures to be filled in by agency , 1994 .

[26]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[27]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  Managing Innovation Fields in a Cross‐Industry Exploratory Partnership with C–K Design Theory* , 2010 .

[28]  A. Rip,et al.  Narrative Infrastructure in Product Creation Processes , 2000 .

[29]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .

[30]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  Building architectural advantage in the US motion picture industry: Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America , 2009 .

[31]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[32]  Vololona Rabeharisoa,et al.  The Management and Evaluation of Technological Programs and the Dynamics of Techno-economic networks , 1992 .

[33]  John Grin Reflexive Modernisation as a Governance Issue, Or: Designing and Shaping Re-structuration , 2006 .

[34]  Arie Rip,et al.  Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency , 1998 .

[35]  H. Foerster Ethics and second-order cybernetics , 1995 .

[36]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[37]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[38]  C. Bullard Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[39]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003) , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[40]  Foerster H. von Ethics and Second-Order Cybernetics , 1992 .

[41]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  From Actionable Knowledge to Universal Theory in Management Research , 2004 .

[42]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[45]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  From actionable knowledge to universal theories , 2004 .

[46]  Pat Carr Management and Evaluation , 1990 .

[47]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies , 2008 .

[48]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[49]  Marc Barbier Pratiques de recherche et invention d'une situation de gestion d'un risque de nuisance : d'une étude de cas à une recherche-intervention , 1998 .

[50]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[51]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[52]  Pascal Le Masson,et al.  The Value of a 'Failed' R&D Project: An Emerging Evaluation Framework for Building Innovative Capabilities , 2009 .

[53]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Modes of experimentation: an innovation process--and competitive--variable , 1998 .

[54]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study: The emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry , 2004 .

[55]  François Fourcade,et al.  Managing creativity process in innovation driven competition , 2006 .