Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries

Abstract Ten years ago only a handful of very rudimentary contingent valuation (CV) studies had been conducted in developing countries; at that time the problems associated with posing hypothetical questions to low-income, perhaps illiterate respondents were assumed to be so overwhelming that one should not even try. Today it is now assumed by many environmental and resource economists and policy analysts working in developing countries that contingent valuation surveys are straightforward and easy to do. This paper examines some of the issues that have arisen and some of the lessons learned over the last 10 years about administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries. The paper focuses on five issues in particular. 1. (a) explaining to enumerators what a contingent valuation study is all about; 2. (b) interpreting responses to contingent valuation questions; 3. (c) setting referendum prices; 4. (d) constructing joint public-private CV scenarios; 5. (e) ethical problems in conducting such surveys. It is argued that there are numerous issues that arise in contingent valuation work in developing countries that demand careful attention, but that in many respects it is easier to do high-quality contingent valuation surveys in developing countries than in industrialized countries.

[1]  Alistair Ulph,et al.  Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically , 1996 .

[2]  Duncan MacRae,et al.  Expert Advice for Policy Choice: Analysis & Discourse , 1997 .

[3]  Hua Wang,et al.  Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model , 1997 .

[4]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta-analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Water Services in Developing Countries: A Case Study of the Use of Contingent Valuation Surveys in Southern Haiti , 1990, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[6]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Information Bias in Contingent Valuation: Effects of Personal Relevance, Quality of Information, and Motivational Orientation , 1996 .

[7]  Maynard M. Hufschmidt,et al.  Economic valuation techniques for the environment : a case study workbook , 1988 .

[8]  D. Lauria.  Planning in Squatter Settlements: An Interview with a Community Leader , 1989 .

[9]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[10]  W. Hanemann,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992 .

[11]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies. , 1993 .

[12]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection , 1993 .

[13]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Rethinking rural water supply policy in the Punjab, Pakistan , 1993 .

[14]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program , 1995 .

[15]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Household demand for improved sanitation services in Kumasi, Ghana: A contingent valuation study , 1993 .

[16]  Dominic Moran,et al.  Economic Values and the Environment in the Developing World , 1997 .

[17]  Barbara Kanninen,et al.  Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation , 1995 .

[18]  B. Swallow,et al.  Evaluating willingness to contribute to a local public good: Application of contingent valuation to tsetse control in Ethiopia , 1994 .

[19]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[20]  R. Carson,et al.  Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1995 .

[21]  John Briscoe,et al.  Toward equitable and sustainable rural water supplies: a contingent valuation study in Brazil. , 1990 .

[22]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of Taiwan , 1997 .

[23]  R. Bhatia,et al.  Rural water supply in Kerala, India: How to emerge from a low‐level equilibrium trap , 1993 .

[24]  Dale Whittington,et al.  The Economic Benefits of Surface Water Quality Improvements in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Davao, Philippines , 1996 .

[25]  D. Whittington,et al.  Urban sewer planning in developing countries and the neighborhood deal : a case study of Semarang, Indonesia , 1997 .

[26]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Giving Respondents Time to Think in Contingent Valuation Studies: A Developing Country Application* , 1992 .

[27]  William D. Schulze,et al.  A Test for Payment Card Biases , 1996 .

[28]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1996 .

[29]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models , 1995 .

[30]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models , 1995 .

[31]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies , 1993 .