Penalized-likelihood estimators and noise analysis for randoms-precorrected PET transmission scans

This paper analyzes and compares image reconstruction methods based on practical approximations to the exact log likelihood of randoms precorrected positron emission tomography (PET) measurements. The methods apply to both emission and transmission tomography, however, in this paper the authors focus on transmission tomography. The results of experimental PET transmission scans and variance approximations demonstrate that the shifted Poisson (SP) method avoids the systematic bias of the conventional data-weighted least squares (WLS) method and leads to significantly lower variance than conventional statistical methods based on the log likelihood of the ordinary Poisson (OF) model. The authors develop covariance approximations to analyze the propagation of noise from attenuation maps into emission images via the attenuation correction factors (ACF's). Empirical pixel and region variances from real transmission data agree closely with the analytical predictions. Both the approximations and the empirical results show that the performance differences between the OP model and SP model are even larger, when considering noise propagation from the transmission images into the final emission images, than the differences in the attenuation maps themselves.

[1]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Problems in Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Attenuation Correction in High Resolution PET , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 2. Effects of inaccurate attenuation correction. , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  E U Mumcuoğlu,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of PET images: methodology and performance analysis. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Fast Monotonic Algorithms for Transmission Tomography , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Statistical image reconstruction methods for randoms-precorrected PET scans , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  J. Fessler,et al.  Objective functions for tomographic reconstruction from randoms-precorrected PET scans , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[7]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Optimization of transmission and emission scan duration in 3D whole-body PET , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Approximate variance images for penalized-likelihood image reconstruction , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Detailed investigation of transmission and emission data smoothing protocols and their effects on emission images , 1996 .

[11]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Conjugate-gradient preconditioning methods for shift-variant PET image reconstruction , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Preconditioning methods for improved convergence rates in iterative reconstructions , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Hybrid Poisson/polynomial Objective Functions for Tomographic Image Reconstruction from Transmission Scans , 2022 .

[14]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Exploring estimator bias-variance tradeoffs using the uniform CR bound , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 4. Effect of Accidental Coincidences , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Scan time optimization for post-injection PET scans , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[17]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  New Statistical Models for Randoms-Precorrected PET Scans , 1997, IPMI.

[18]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Detailed investigation of transmission and emission data smoothing protocols and their effects on emission images , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.

[19]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  D. Snyder,et al.  Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[21]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography , 1980 .

[23]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  A local update strategy for iterative reconstruction from projections , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  W. Moses,et al.  Orbiting transmission source for positron tomography , 1988 .