Influence of refurbishment and service life of reinforced concrete buildings structures on the estimation of environmental impact

PurposeService life strongly affects results of building LCA and is considered equivalent to that of its structure. Quantitatively obtaining this parameter is a complex task that remains unsolved in the literature. This paper provides a methodology to estimate the service life of a building and quantitative data related to the environmental impact of demolition plus new construction and refurbishment, considering the potential service life and the ability of refurbishment to extend it.MethodsThis paper focuses on reinforced concrete structures, specifically on beams, as service life of buildings is taken as that of its structure. Firstly, a methodology to estimate the service-life value to conduct the LCA is provided. The applied methodology is based on the definition of different scenarios that include four different approaches to reinforced concrete beam interventions in the long term. The methodology can be extended to a complete building structure. Secondly, LCA of demolition plus new construction and refurbishment in different scenarios are carried out. Finally, the complete methodology is applied to a case study.Results and discussionConcrete structures have a potential service life much longer than the minimum value prescribed in the codes, in this case study, more than five times. Reinforced concrete is subject to degradation and aging with time and several models existing to assess the effects. In addition, a structure can be refurbished, which strongly affects its service life. These different strategies when applied to a case study result in differences of up to 65% in non-renewable primary energy consumption in a 250-year period. Embodied energy and CO2 per year of buildings which are not constant values. The appropriate strategy for a specific case study must be taken into account to select the value of service life in LCA.ConclusionsReinforced concrete is a highly impacting material, but also a material with a long potential service life. This durability is not considered in the LCA if the service life value is restricted to the minimum one prescribed in the codes. Demolishing a structure (and therefore, a building) that can last 250 years after just 50 or 80 is a highly impacting action. Refurbishment can ensure this durability and even extend it.

[1]  Antonio García-Martínez,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review , 2017 .

[2]  Juan Monjo Carrió,et al.  Durabilidad vs Vulnerabilidad , 2007 .

[3]  Beatriz Palacios-Munoz,et al.  Simplified structural design and LCA of reinforced concrete beams strengthening techniques , 2018 .

[4]  R. Esposito,et al.  Influence of the Alkali-Silica Reaction on the Mechanical Degradation of Concrete , 2016 .

[5]  Carl-Alexander Graubner,et al.  Eurocode 0 - Grundlagen der Tragwerksplanung / Eurocode 0 - basis of structural design , 2011 .

[6]  Rob Marsh.  Building lifespan: effect on the environmental impact of building components in a Danish perspective , 2017 .

[7]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  The life cycle carbon footprint of refurbished and new buildings – A systematic review of case studies , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[8]  Jorge Ferreira,et al.  Economic and environmental savings of structural buildings refurbishment with demolition and reconstruction - A Portuguese benchmarking , 2015 .

[9]  D. J. E. Veronelli.  Durabilidad de los hormigones. Reacción árido-álcalis , 1978 .

[10]  C. Andrade,et al.  Recent durability studies on concrete structure , 2015 .

[11]  Laure Itard,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction , 2007 .

[12]  Holger König,et al.  Benchmarks for life cycle costs and life cycle assessment of residential buildings , 2012 .

[13]  Paul Strachan,et al.  Achieving a holistic view of the life cycle performance of existing dwellings , 2013 .

[14]  Stéphane Multon,et al.  Structural behavior of concrete beams affected by alkali-silica reaction , 2005 .

[15]  C. Andrade,et al.  Corrosion induced cracking: Effect of different corrosion rates on crack width evolution , 2017 .

[16]  Anne Power,et al.  Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability? , 2008 .

[17]  Alan Meier,et al.  Energy impacts of recycling disassembly material in residential buildings. , 2001 .

[18]  Benjamin Paul Goldstein,et al.  Gaps in tools assessing the energy implications of renovation versus rebuilding decisions , 2013 .

[19]  T. Zhao,et al.  Steel reinforcement corrosion in concrete under combined actions: The role of freeze-thaw cycles, chloride ingress, and surface impregnation , 2017 .

[20]  S. Bonnet,et al.  A new meta-model to calculate carbonation front depth within concrete structures , 2016 .

[21]  Stephanie Carlisle,et al.  The influence of durability and recycling on life cycle impacts of window frame assemblies , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Teresa Gallego,et al.  Comparison of environmental impacts of building structures with in situ cast floors and with precast concrete floors , 2009 .

[23]  Benoit Fournier,et al.  Evaluation of the stiffness damage test (SDT) as a tool for assessing damage in concrete due to ASR: Test loading and output responses for concretes incorporating fine or coarse reactive aggregates , 2014 .

[24]  A C Smith,et al.  Corrosion of steel in concrete , 1982 .

[25]  W. Pan,et al.  Rethinking system boundaries of the life cycle carbon emissions of buildings , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[26]  Endrit Hoxha,et al.  Influence of service life on building LCA , 2014 .

[27]  Abdul Kareem Almarshad,et al.  A knowledge-based BIM system for building maintenance , 2013 .

[28]  C. Andrade,et al.  Corrosion of Reinforcing Bars in Carbonated Concrete , 1980 .

[29]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  Obsolescencia de la envolvente térmica y acústica de la vivienda social de la postguerra española en áreas urbanas vulnerables. El caso de Zaragoza , 2015 .

[30]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Service life of the dwelling stock in Spain , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.