Psychometric model for safety culture assessment in nuclear research facilities

Abstract A safe and reliable operation of nuclear power plants depends not only on technical performance, but also on the people and on the organization. Organizational factors have been recognized as the main causal mechanisms of accidents by research organizations through USA, Europe and Japan. Deficiencies related with these factors reveal weaknesses in the organization’s safety culture. A significant number of instruments to assess the safety culture based on psychometric models that evaluate safety climate through questionnaires, and which are based on reliability and validity evidences, have been published in health and ‘safety at work’ areas. However, there are few safety culture assessment instruments with these characteristics (reliability and validity) available on nuclear literature. Therefore, this work proposes an instrument to evaluate, with valid and reliable measures, the safety climate of nuclear research facilities. The instrument was developed based on methodological principles applied to research modeling and its psychometric properties were evaluated by a reliability analysis and validation of content, face and construct. The instrument was applied to an important nuclear research organization in Brazil. This organization comprises 4 research reactors and many nuclear laboratories. The survey results made possible a demographic characterization and the identification of some possible safety culture weaknesses and pointing out potential areas to be improved in the assessed organization. Good evidence of reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.951 was obtained. Validation method was based on Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Varimax orthogonal factor rotation. The results confirmed the unidimensionality of the items and, almost entirely, the conceptual framework of the safety culture proposed for the instrument. However, the results also suggested that some adjustments to the conceptual framework of the instrument must be performed in case of a new application.

[1]  Erin L Alexander,et al.  Safety culture in the nuclear power industry : attributes for regulatory assessment , 2004 .

[2]  Ronald J. Willey,et al.  The accident in Bhopal: Observations 20 years later , 2007 .

[3]  Eun-Seok Cha,et al.  Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  James T. Reason,et al.  Achieving a safe culture : theory and practice , 1998 .

[5]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods , 2009 .

[6]  Luca Pietrantoni,et al.  Testing the validity of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safety culture model. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Division on Earth.  COMMITTEE ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOR IMPROVING SAFETY AND SECURITY OF U.S. NUCLEAR PLANTS , 2014 .

[8]  J. N. Sørensen,et al.  Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Stephanie L. Morrow.  Independent Evaluation of INPO's Nuclear Safety Culture Survey and Construct Validation Study , 2012 .

[10]  M. D. Cooper.  Towards a model of safety culture , 2000 .

[11]  D Díaz-Cabrera,et al.  An evaluation of a new instrument to measure organisational safety culture values and practices. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variability , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants.

[14]  Terence Lee,et al.  Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant , 1998 .

[15]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[16]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[17]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research , 2003 .

[18]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[19]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[20]  Samuel G. Charlton,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors Testing and Evaluation , 1996 .

[21]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Safety culture in nuclear power operations , 2001 .

[22]  Taeki Lee,et al.  Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations , 2000 .

[23]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition) , 1992 .

[24]  Paul Baybutt,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS METHODS FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES , 2006 .

[25]  Mitchell Rogovin,et al.  Three Mile Island : a report to the Commissioners and to the public , 1980 .

[26]  Dov Zohar,et al.  Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[28]  Kath Bhanot,et al.  Preliminary fact finding mission following the accident at the nuclear fuel processing facility in Tokaimura, Japan (Vienna: IAEA) , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.