Effects of unexpected perturbations on trajectories and EMG patterns of rapid wrist flexion movements in humans

To investigate how motor programs can be modified by sensory inputs we recorded kinematic and EMG patterns from normal human subjects performing well-practised wrist flexion movements in response to an auditory tone. On random trials unexpected wrist perturbations were introduced at varying times after the signal to move had been given. Extension perturbations delivered before agonist EMG onset resulted in an increased maximum velocity (MV) during the wrist flexion movement and in an increased target overshoot even though the wrist was further from the target than expected by the subject at the onset of the movement. The first agonist EMG burst and the antagonist burst were both increased in magnitude in these perturbed trials. Flexion perturbations delivered before the agonist EMG onset moved the hand nearer to the target just prior to movement onset. These resulted in a reduced MV, but the expected increased target overshoot did not occur. The first agonist burst was reduced in magnitude, and the antagonist burst was increased in magnitude. Perturbations delivered after agonist EMG onset produced less change in the first agonist and antagonist EMG burst, and less compensation for the perturbation was evident in wrist position and velocity recordings. These results indicate that, at least in some situations, motor programs for rapid voluntary movements can be modified by afferent inputs. This interaction between central motor commands and sensory feedback might occur at the cortical or spinal level, depending on when perturbations occur relative to onset of EMG and movement. The timing of the EMG changes suggest that both reflex mechanisms and longer latency 'voluntary' adjustments contribute to the compensatory changes in movement trajectory.

[1]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle. , 1968, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Response to transient disturbances during intentional forearm flexion in man , 1978, Brain Research.

[3]  R. Lee,et al.  Modification of Motor Output to Compensate for Unanticipated Load Conditions During Rapid Voluntary Movements , 1986, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[4]  B. Day,et al.  ABNORMALITIES IN CENTRAL MOTOR PATHWAY CONDUCTION IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS , 1984, The Lancet.

[5]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  M. Hallett,et al.  Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Sanes,et al.  Effects of perturbations on accuracy of arm movements , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  H. B. Morton,et al.  SCOPE OF A TECHNIQUE FOR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN BRAIN, SPINAL CORD, AND MUSCLE , 1982, The Lancet.

[10]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  B L Day,et al.  Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feed‐back , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Terminal Accuracy of Unexpectedly Loaded Rapid Movements , 1980 .

[13]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[14]  J. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst is modified by perturbations preceding movement , 1986, Brain Research.