Drag reduction in turbulent pipe flow with feedback control applied partially to wall

Abstract Turbulent pipe flow controlled by the opposition control algorithm [J. Fluid Mech. 262 (1994) 75–110] is studied by means of direct numerical simulation. A special focus is laid upon a scheme in which the control input is applied only partially over a limited length in the streamwise direction, but not on the entire wall surface. The upstream control effect remains over a distance of about 11–14 times the pipe radius downstream of the point where the control is terminated. This results, however, in a simple relationship that the average drag reduction rate is nearly proportional to the control length. The recovery process after the control termination is quantitatively investigated by applying a recently proposed exact relation between the skin friction and the Reynolds stress distribution [Phys. Fluids 14 (11) (2002) L73–L76] and also by performing a budget analysis specially designed for that purpose.

[1]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  FEEDBACK CONTROL OF WALL TURBULENCE WITH WALL DEFORMATION , 2000, Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[3]  P. Moin,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Ruben Rathnasingham,et al.  Active control of turbulent boundary layers , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of curved turbulent channel flow , 1984 .

[6]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  Reynolds Number Effect on Wall Turbulence: Toward Effective Feedback Control , 2002 .

[7]  성형진,et al.  Suboptimal control for drag reduction in turbulent pipe flow , 2002 .

[8]  R. Moser,et al.  Spectral methods for the Navier-Stokes equations with one infinite and two periodic directions , 1991 .

[9]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Direct simulations of turbulent flow using finite-difference schemes , 1991 .

[10]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Observed mechanisms for turbulence attenuation and enhancement in opposition-controlled wall-bounded flows , 1998 .

[11]  Koji Fukagata,et al.  Highly energy-conservative finite difference method for the cylindrical coordinate system , 2002 .

[12]  Koji Fukagata,et al.  Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows , 2002 .

[13]  Haecheon Choi,et al.  Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  P. Moin,et al.  Reynolds-stress and dissipation-rate budgets in a turbulent channel flow , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Srinivas Ramakrishnan,et al.  Viscous effects in control of near-wall turbulence , 2002 .

[16]  P. Moin,et al.  Direct Finite-Difference Simulations Of Turbulent Flow , 1991 .

[17]  Jerry Westerweel,et al.  Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent transport with uniform wall injection and suction , 1995 .