The mossy fibre-granule cell relay of the cerebellum and its inhibitory control by Golgi cells

Summary1.The glomerulus in the cerebellar granular layer is composed of the three elements; the mossy fibre terminal, the granule cell dendrites and the Golgi cell axons. The afferent input to the cerebellar cortex through the glomerulus, the mossy fibre-granule cell relay (M.G.R.), and its inhibitory control by the Golgi cells were studied by recording, a) extracellular field potentials in the granular and molecular layers, b) unitary spikes of granule cells, and c) intracellular postsynaptic potentials in Purkinje cells.2.Mossy fibres were activated by juxta-fastigial, transfolial, lateral cuneate nucleus and radial nerve stimulation. Stimulation of an adjacent folium (transfolial stimulation) could excite branches of mossy fibres under the stimulating electrode which supply other branches also to the folium under the recording electrode. This technique was utilized to distinguish the response due to mossy fibre activation from those due to the climbing fibre and Purkinje cell axons.3.These stimulations resulted in, through the M.G.R., a powerful activation of granule cells whose axons (parallel fibres) excited in turn the Purkinje cells and the inhibitory interneurones, including the Golgi cells, in the molecular layer.4.Field potentials and unitary spikes due to granule cell activity elicited by the stimulation of mossy fibres were markedly depressed for hundreds of milliseconds after the direct stimulation of parallel fibres (LOC stimulation). The postsynaptic potential in Purkinje cells evoked by mossy fibre activation was also depressed by the conditioning LOC stimulation in the same manner. The “spontaneous” background activities recorded from granule cells as unitary spikes and from Purkinje cells as inhibitory synaptic noise were silenced for hundreds of milliseconds after the LOC stimulation.5.These depressions indicate that the parallel fibre activation evokes an inhibitory action upon M.G.R. On anatomical grounds this inhibition can be mediated only by the Golgi cell, and it is postulated that the inhibitory action is postsynaptic upon the dendrites of granule cells.6.It is concluded that the Golgi cell inhibition regulates the mossy fibre input to the cerebellar cortex at the M.G.R. by a form of negative feed-back.

[1]  J SZENTAGOTHAI,et al.  THE USE OF DEGENERATION METHODS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SHORT NEURONAL CONNEXIONS. , 1965, Progress in brain research.

[2]  S. R. Cajal,et al.  Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las Aves , 1888 .

[3]  J. Eccles,et al.  The inhibitory interneurones within the cerebellar cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. Eccles,et al.  Intracellularly recorded responses of the cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  J. Frezik Associative connections established by Purkinje axon collaterals between different parts of the cerebellar cortex. , 1963, Acta morphologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.

[6]  C. A. Fox,et al.  A quantitative study of the Purkinje cell dendritic branchlets and their relationship to afferent fibres. , 1957, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  G. Grant,et al.  Spinal course and somatotopically localized termination of the spinocerebellar tracts. An experimental study in the cat. , 1962, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[8]  J. Eccles,et al.  The excitatory synaptic action of climbing fibres on the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  B. Holmqvist,et al.  Functional Organization of the Cuneocerebellar Tract in the Cat , 1963 .

[10]  C. Fox,et al.  The intermediate cells of Lugaro in the cerebellar cortex of the monkey , 1959, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  R. Eager,et al.  The mode of termination and temporal course of degeneration of cortical association pathways in the cerebellum of the cat , 1965, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  V. Braitenberg,et al.  Morphological observations on the cerebellar cortex , 1958, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J. Eccles,et al.  POSTSYNAPTIC INHIBITION OF CEREBELLAR PURKINJE CELLS. , 1964, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  R. Llinás,et al.  Parallel fibre stimulation and the responses induced thereby in the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Observations on the intracortical relations of the climbing fibers of the cerebellum. A Golgi study , 1954, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes acting upon individual Purkinje cells of the cerebellum in cats , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  C. R. Dutta The Purkinje cell dendritic branchlets and their relation with the parallel fibers Light and electron microscopic observations , 1964 .

[18]  R. L. Nó,et al.  A Study Of Nerve Physiology , 1947 .

[19]  R Llinás,et al.  The action of antidromic impulses on the cerebellar Purkinje cells , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Szentágothai,et al.  Über den Ursprung der Kletterfasern des Kleinhirns , 1959, Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[21]  J. Eccles,et al.  The specific ionic conductances and the ionic movements across the motoneuronal membrane that produce the inhibitory post‐synaptic potential , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  K. Obata,et al.  Monosynaptic inhibition of the intracerebellar nuclei induced from the cerebellar cortex , 1964, Experientia.

[23]  J ECCLES Functional Meaning of the Patterns of Synaptic Connections in the Cerebellum , 1965, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[24]  M. Ito,et al.  The cerebellar-evoked monosynaptic inhibition of Deiters' neurones , 1964, Experientia.