Electromyography of superficial cervical muscles with exertion in the sagittal, coronal and oblique planes

Abstract. The purpose of the current study was twofold: (1) to determine the isometric force and electromyographic (EMG) relationship of the sternocleidomastoid, splenii and trapezii muscles bilaterally in graded and maximal exertions in the sagittal, coronal and oblique planes, and (2) to develop regression equations to predict force based on the EMG scores. A newly designed and validated cervical isometric strength testing device was used to measure the cervical muscle isometric strength and force/EMG relationship in cervical flexion, extension, bilateral lateral flexion, bilateral anterolateral flexion, and bilateral posterolateral extension, all beginning with an upright seated neutral posture. A group of 40 healthy subjects were asked to exert their cervical motions in the directions of interest, while the force output and EMG from the sternocleidomastoids, splenii, and trapezii were sampled bilaterally at 1 kHz. ANOVA, correlation, and regression analyses were carried out. The force and EMG scores were significantly different between the directions of effort (P<0.01). All regressions were significant (P<0.01). All subjects registered the highest forces in pure extension and the lowest in pure flexion, showing a gradual decrease from the posterior to anterior direction. There was a modest correlation between EMG of the investigated muscles and force (r=0.15–0.76, P<0.01). EMG output was, for example, approximately 66% higher in flexion than in extension (while force output was roughly 30% less in flexion than extension) – thus relatively more muscle activity was required in flexion than extension to generate a given force. The intermediate positions (i.e. anterolateral flexion) revealed force/EMG ratio scores that were intermediate in relation to the force/EMG ratios for pure flexion and pure extension. The cervical muscle strength and cervical muscle EMG are therefore dependent on the direction of effort.

[1]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[2]  M Revel,et al.  Influence of head position on dorsal neck muscle efficiency. , 1993, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  R. P. Howard,et al.  Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts , 1993 .

[4]  Å. Nygren,et al.  Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D H West,et al.  Low speed rear-end collision testing using human subjects , 1993 .

[6]  O. Hämäläinen.  Flight helmet weight, +Gz forces, and neck muscle strain. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  Susan M. Lord,et al.  Chronic Cervical Zygapophysial Joint Pain After Whiplash: A Placebo‐Controlled Prevalence Study , 1996, Spine.

[8]  Robert D. Anderson,et al.  Human Occupant Kinematic Response to Low Speed Rear-End Impacts , 1994 .

[9]  K Schüldt,et al.  Activity levels during isometric test contractions of neck and shoulder muscles. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  J. B. Wheeler,et al.  Clinical response of human subjects to rear-end automobile collisions. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  J. Cassidy,et al.  Impairment and work disability due to whiplash injury following traffic collisions. An analysis of insurance material from the Swedish Road Traffic Injury Commission. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[12]  H Seidel,et al.  Control of positioning the cervical spine and its application to measuring extensor strength. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  S. Meyer,et al.  Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts? , 1997, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[14]  S. Kumar,et al.  Role of awareness in head-neck acceleration in low velocity rear-end impacts. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Investigation of the Kinematics and Kinetics of Whiplash , 1967 .

[16]  K Schüldt,et al.  On neck muscle activity and load reduction in sitting postures. An electromyographic and biomechanical study with applications in ergonomics and rehabilitation. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[17]  R. Ferrari,et al.  Epidemiology of whiplash: an international dilemma* , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  J. H. Mathewson,et al.  Controlled automobile rearend collisions, an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. , 1955, Canadian services medical journal.

[19]  Croft Ac.  Neck pain in the general population. , 1995 .

[20]  J. R. Ferrari,et al.  The Whiplash Encyclopedia: The Facts and Myths of Whiplash , 1999 .

[21]  K Ono,et al.  Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  O Hämäläinen,et al.  Effect of Gz forces and head movements on cervical erector spinae muscle strain. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.