Pizza HCI: Improving Medical App HCI

HCI recognises the “sandwich” of users/interactive systems/tasks – ideally achieving effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction for the user – hence user centred design and other key methodologies of HCI. For medical apps this is not sufficient, as patient outcomes are more important than usability. We aim to stimulate discussion on the need for a new approach, we tentatively call “pizza HCI,” which emphasises the more rounded form of HCI needed to respect the patient: patient/clinician/system/clinical task/patient. Core user-centred design methods, such as think aloud, need extending into pizza HCI by greater emphasis on stakeholders than on users in isolation.

[1]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  Mobile health: Four emerging themes of research , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  R. Halfens,et al.  Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in intensive care patients: a literature review. , 2008, Nursing in critical care.

[3]  Robyn Whittaker,et al.  Issues in mHealth: Findings From Key Informant Interviews , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Michiel Meulendijk,et al.  What Concerns Users of Medical Apps? Exploring Non-Functional Requirements of Medical Mobile Applications , 2014, ECIS.

[5]  Joseph L. Kannry,et al.  The Relationship of Usability to Medical Error: An Evaluation of Errors Associated with Usability Problems in the Use of a Handheld Application for Prescribing Medications , 2004, MedInfo.

[6]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction , 2008 .

[7]  P. Schulz,et al.  Mapping mHealth Research: A Decade of Evolution , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Asta Thoroddsen Rn,et al.  Accuracy, completeness and comprehensiveness of information on pressure ulcers recorded in the patient record , 2012 .

[9]  G. Yarkony,et al.  Pressure ulcers: a review. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Emily Gerth-Guyette,et al.  Impact of mHealth Chronic Disease Management on Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  J. Posnett,et al.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. , 2004, Age and ageing.

[12]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Challenges, Methodologies, and Issues in the Usability Testing of Mobile Applications , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  William Brown,et al.  Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Cheng-Li Liu,et al.  A Mobile Nursing Information System Based on Human-Computer Interaction Design for Improving Quality of Nursing , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[15]  Hanan Khalil,et al.  Reduction in wound healing times, cost of consumables and number of visits treated through the implementation of an electronic wound care system in rural Australia , 2016, International wound journal.

[16]  K. Watts,et al.  An integrative review of the impact of mobile technologies used by healthcare professionals to support education and practice , 2015, Nursing open.

[17]  P. Franks,et al.  The burden of chronic wounds in the UK. , 2008, Nursing times.

[18]  Xihui Zhang,et al.  ASSESSMENT METRICS, CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES FOR MOBILE HEALTH APPS , 2014 .

[19]  Masatake Yamamichi,et al.  Mobile applications for the health sector , 2012 .

[20]  E. Murray,et al.  Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions , 2018, Digital health.

[21]  Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite,et al.  On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering , 2009, Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications.