Accuracy of volume and DVH parameters determined with different brachytherapy treatment planning systems.

PURPOSE To determine the uncertainties in dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis used in modern brachytherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS A phantom with three different volumes was scanned with CT and MRI. An inter-observer analysis was based on contouring performed by 5 persons. The volume of a standard contour set was calculated using seven different TPSs. For five systems a typical brachytherapy dose distribution was used to compare DVH determination. RESULTS The inter-observer variability (1SD) was 13% for a small cylindrical volume, 5% for a large cylinder and 3% for a conical shape. A standardized volume for a 4mm CT scan contoured on seven different TPS varied by 7%, 2%, and 5% (1SD). Use of smaller slice thickness reduced the variations. A treatment plan with the sources between the large cylindrical shape and the cone showed variations for D(2cc) of 1% and 5% (1SD), respectively. Deviations larger than 10% were observed for a smaller source to cylinder surface distance of 5mm. CONCLUSIONS Modern TPSs minimize the volumetric and dosimetric calculation uncertainties. These are comparable to inter-observer contouring variations. However, differences in volume result from the methods of calculation in the first and last slice of a contoured structure. For this situation and in case of high dose gradients inside analyzed volumes, high uncertainties were observed. The use of DVH parameters in clinical practice should take into account the method of calculation and the possible uncertainties.

[1]  Dan Ash,et al.  The correlation between D90 and outcome for I-125 seed implant monotherapy for localised prostate cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  L. Potters,et al.  Critical organ dosimetry in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy: defining the organs at risk. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[3]  P. Pareek,et al.  Radiography-based treatment planning compared with computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning for intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix: analysis of dose-volume histograms. , 2003, Brachytherapy.

[4]  Patricia J Eifel,et al.  Comparison between CT-based volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum during intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R. Pötter,et al.  GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Ivan Yeung,et al.  Interobserver variation in postimplant computed tomography contouring affects quality assessment of prostate brachytherapy. , 2002, Brachytherapy.

[7]  S Nag,et al.  The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  D. Ash,et al.  ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on permanent seed implantation for localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Berechnungsgenauigkeit von Volumina zur Evaluierung von Dosis-Volumen-Histogrammen , 1998, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[10]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  W. Butler,et al.  Comparison of dose length, area, and volume histograms as quantifiers of urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Kent Wallner,et al.  The effect of interobserver differences in post-implant prostate CT image interpretation on dosimetric parameters. , 2003, Medical physics.

[15]  H. Katoh,et al.  Acute genitourinary toxicity after high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: Second analysis to determine the correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxi , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  L. Potters,et al.  A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  T. Hellebust,et al.  Inter fraction variations in rectum and bladder volumes and dose distributions during high dose rate brachytherapy treatment of the uterine cervix investigated by repetitive CT-examinations. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  J F Williamson,et al.  Monte Carlo aided dosimetry of the microselectron pulsed and high dose-rate 192Ir sources. , 1995, Medical physics.

[19]  Carolyn A. Bucholtz,et al.  Shape-based interpolation , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.