Mutual Inactivation of Notch Receptors and Ligands Facilitates Developmental Patterning

Developmental patterning requires juxtacrine signaling in order to tightly coordinate the fates of neighboring cells. Recent work has shown that Notch and Delta, the canonical metazoan juxtacrine signaling receptor and ligand, mutually inactivate each other in the same cell. This cis-interaction generates mutually exclusive sending and receiving states in individual cells. It generally remains unclear, however, how this mutual inactivation and the resulting switching behavior can impact developmental patterning circuits. Here we address this question using mathematical modeling in the context of two canonical pattern formation processes: boundary formation and lateral inhibition. For boundary formation, in a model motivated by Drosophila wing vein patterning, we find that mutual inactivation allows sharp boundary formation across a broader range of parameters than models lacking mutual inactivation. This model with mutual inactivation also exhibits robustness to correlated gene expression perturbations. For lateral inhibition, we find that mutual inactivation speeds up patterning dynamics, relieves the need for cooperative regulatory interactions, and expands the range of parameter values that permit pattern formation, compared to canonical models. Furthermore, mutual inactivation enables a simple lateral inhibition circuit architecture which requires only a single downstream regulatory step. Both model systems show how mutual inactivation can facilitate robust fine-grained patterning processes that would be difficult to implement without it, by encoding a difference-promoting feedback within the signaling system itself. Together, these results provide a framework for analysis of more complex Notch-dependent developmental systems.

[1]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Cis Interactions between Notch and Delta Generate Mutually Exclusive Signaling States , 2010, Nature.

[2]  K. Jones,et al.  Mastermind recruits CycC:CDK8 to phosphorylate the Notch ICD and coordinate activation with turnover. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[3]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  T. Hwa,et al.  Small RNAs establish gene expression thresholds. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[5]  N. Baker,et al.  The roles of cis-inactivation by Notch ligands and of neuralized during eye and bristle patterning in Drosophila , 2004, BMC Developmental Biology.

[6]  Adam C. Miller,et al.  cis-Inhibition of Notch by Endogenous Delta Biases the Outcome of Lateral Inhibition , 2009, Current Biology.

[7]  T. L. Jacobsen,et al.  Feedback regulation is central to Delta-Notch signalling required for Drosophila wing vein morphogenesis. , 1997, Development.

[8]  P. Simpson,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of Notch and Delta: requirement for neuroblast segregation in Drosophila. , 1997, Development.

[9]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Stochasticity and Cell Fate , 2008, Science.

[10]  N. Wingreen,et al.  The Small RNA Chaperone Hfq and Multiple Small RNAs Control Quorum Sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae , 2004, Cell.

[11]  A Gierer,et al.  Generation and regeneration of sequence of structures during morphogenesis. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  S. Blair,et al.  The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. , 1997, Development.

[13]  P. Maini,et al.  Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  T. Klein,et al.  An intrinsic dominant negative activity of serrate that is modulated during wing development in Drosophila. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[15]  A. Parks,et al.  Notch and suppressor of Hairless regulate levels but not patterns of Delta expression in Drosophila , 2008, Genesis.

[16]  P. Simpson,et al.  The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila , 1991, Cell.

[17]  R. Goodyear,et al.  Pattern Formation in the Basilar Papilla: Evidence for Cell Rearrangement , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Leonor Saiz,et al.  DNA looping: the consequences and its control. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Bistability in cell signaling: How to make continuous processes discontinuous, and reversible processes irreversible. , 2001, Chaos.

[20]  J. Vielmetter,et al.  Genetic interactions in early neurogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1985, Journal of neurogenetics.

[21]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  M. Matsuda,et al.  Interaction with Notch determines endocytosis of specific Delta ligands in zebrafish neural tissue , 2009, Development.

[23]  S. Bray Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  Clare Garvey,et al.  Role of conserved intracellular motifs in Serrate signalling, cis‐inhibition and endocytosis , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Iva Greenwald,et al.  Reciprocal changes in expression of the receptor lin-12 and its ligand lag-2 prior to commitment in a C. elegans cell fate decision , 1994, Cell.

[26]  O. Ohara,et al.  Intracellular cell-autonomous association of Notch and its ligands: a novel mechanism of Notch signal modification. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[27]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  S. Bray,et al.  The Abruptex domain of Notch regulates negative interactions between Notch, its ligands and Fringe. , 2000, Development.

[29]  N. Wingreen,et al.  A quantitative comparison of sRNA-based and protein-based gene regulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[30]  A. Garcı́a-Bellido,et al.  Notch signalling regulates veinlet expression and establishes boundaries between veins and interveins in the Drosophila wing. , 1997, Development.

[31]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , .

[32]  E. Bier,et al.  The Drosophila rhomboid gene mediates the localized formation of wing veins and interacts genetically with components of the EGF-R signaling pathway. , 1993, Genes & development.

[33]  S. Bray,et al.  Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. , 1997, Development.

[34]  L E Scriven,et al.  Instability and dynamic pattern in cellular networks. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  P. Simpson,et al.  Altered epidermal growth factor-like sequences provide evidence for a role of Notch as a receptor in cell fate decisions. , 1993, Development.

[36]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Engineering synthetic signaling proteins with ultrasensitive input/output control , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Near-critical phenomena in intracellular metabolite pools. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Error Minimization in Lateral Inhibition Circuits , 2010, Science Signaling.

[39]  T. Hwa,et al.  Quantitative Characteristics of Gene Regulation by Small RNA , 2007, PLoS Biology.

[40]  E. Plahte Pattern formation in discrete cell lattices , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[41]  H. Meinhardt Models of biological pattern formation , 1982 .

[42]  A. M. Arias,et al.  A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila , 2010, Current Biology.