Analyzing forest canopies with ground-based laser scanning: A comparison with hemispherical photography

Abstract We tested ground-based high resolution laser scanning as a tool for analyzing the complex canopy structure of temperate broad-leaved forests. The canopies of 35 groups of trees were analyzed by laser scans from various positions inside a mixed stand to generate three-dimensional (3D) point clouds of the axes and leaves. The scan data was used to produce hemispheric views of the canopy at various locations that were compared to synchronously taken hemispherical photographs of the same part of the canopy. We conclude that terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) in mature forests can overcome several of the methodological problems inherent to conventional canopy analysis with optical methods and thus may soon offer a promising tool for functional research in complex forest canopies. Certain limitations of the TLS approach, mostly caused by hardware limitations that will probably soon be overcome, are encountered.

[1]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques , 2007 .

[2]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  The structural and radiative consistency of three-dimensional tree reconstructions from terrestrial lidar , 2009 .

[3]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[4]  D. Coombe,et al.  Hemisperical and Woodland Canopy Photography and the Light Climate , 1959 .

[5]  Benjamin Koetz,et al.  Forest Canopy Gap Fraction From Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Margaret C. Anderson.  Studies of the Woodland Light Climate: I. The Photographic Computation of Light Conditions , 1964 .

[7]  R. Grote,et al.  Competitive strategies in adult beech and spruce: space-related foliar carbon investment versus carbon gain , 2005, Oecologia.

[8]  S. Garman,et al.  Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades , 2006 .

[9]  J. Hardy,et al.  Solar radiation transmission through conifer canopies , 2004 .

[10]  A. Guevara-Escobar,et al.  Use of Digital Photography for Analysis of Canopy Closure , 2005, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  R. Hall,et al.  A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission , 2001 .

[12]  I. Jonckheere,et al.  Influence of measurement set-up of ground-based LiDAR for derivation of tree structure , 2006 .

[13]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Sampling design of ground-based lidar measurements of forest canopy structure and its effect on shadowing , 2008 .

[14]  N. Coops,et al.  Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests , 2003 .

[15]  Pete Watt,et al.  Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning , 2005 .

[16]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[17]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation , 2005 .

[18]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground-based laser called 'Echidna'. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[19]  S. Fleck,et al.  Review of ground-based methods to measure the distribution of biomass in forest canopies , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[20]  Michael Nobis,et al.  Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection , 2005 .

[21]  J. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand , 1991 .