Smooth weight optimization in H∞ loop-shaping design

Abstract Smooth variation in the magnitude response of weights facilitates ℋ ∞ loop-shaping design, as it prevents the cancellation of important modes of the system, for example, lightly damped poles/zeros of flexible structures, when the shaped plant is formed based on closed-loop design specifications. For accurate fitting of transfer functions to magnitude data, smooth weights also allow low-order transfer functions to be used when such smooth variations in their magnitude responses are computed point-wise in frequency. In this paper, smoothness constraints for weights, expressed as gradient constraints on a log scale in dB/decade, which is intuitive from a design perspective, are imposed in a weight optimization framework for ℋ ∞ loop-shaping control. This work builds on [A. Lanzon, Weight optimization in ℋ ∞ loop-shaping, Automatica 41 (1) (2005) 1201–1208], where additional constraints are formulated in linear matrix inequality (LMI) form to cast a complete weight optimization framework. The resulting algorithm thus maximizes the robust stability margin and simultaneously synthesizes smooth weights along with a stabilizing controller. A numerical example is given to elucidate the efficacy of the smoothness constraints in ℋ ∞ loop-shaping control.

[1]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[2]  K. Glover,et al.  Robust stabilization of normalized coprime factor plant descriptions with H/sub infinity /-bounded uncertainty , 1989 .

[3]  K. Glover All optimal Hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their L, ∞ -error bounds† , 1984 .

[4]  P. Coustal,et al.  Industrial application of an H/spl infin/ design method for flexible structures , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications.

[5]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  The design of H∞ controllers for an experimental non-collocated flexible structure problem , 1994, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[6]  A. Preumont Vibration Control of Active Structures , 1997 .

[7]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  D. Bates H∞ control design , 2007 .

[9]  Alexander Lanzon,et al.  Weight optimisation in I loop-shaping , 2005, Autom..

[10]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Pole-zero cancellations and closed-loop properties of an H/sup infinity / mixed sensitivity design problem , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  G. Vinnicombe Uncertainty and Feedback: H-[infinity] loop shaping and the v-gap metric , 2000 .

[12]  P. Coustal,et al.  Industrial application of an H-infinity design method for flexible structures H/sub /spl infin , 1994, IEEE Control Systems.

[13]  Keith Glover,et al.  A loop shaping design procedure , 1990 .

[14]  Keith Glover,et al.  A loop-shaping design procedure using H/sub infinity / synthesis , 1992 .

[15]  Stefan F. Graebe,et al.  Slow stable open-loop poles: to cancel or not to cancel , 1999, Autom..

[16]  George Papageorgiou,et al.  A systematic procedure for designing non-diagonal weights to facilitate /spl Hscr//sub /spl infin// loop shaping , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  M. Braae,et al.  Preventing Pole-Zero Cancellation for Improved Input Disturbance Rejection in Iterative Feedback Tuning Systems , 2008 .