The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for Use in Biology

This paper describes a newly adapted instrument for measuring novice-to-expert-like perceptions about biology: the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Biology (CLASS-Bio). Consisting of 31 Likert-scale statements, CLASS-Bio probes a range of perceptions that vary between experts and novices, including enjoyment of the discipline, propensity to make connections to the real world, recognition of conceptual connections underlying knowledge, and problem-solving strategies. CLASS-Bio has been tested for response validity with both undergraduate students and experts (biology PhDs), allowing student responses to be directly compared with a consensus expert response. Use of CLASS-Bio to date suggests that introductory biology courses have the same challenges as introductory physics and chemistry courses: namely, students shift toward more novice-like perceptions following instruction. However, students in upper-division biology courses do not show the same novice-like shifts. CLASS-Bio can also be paired with other assessments to: 1) examine how student perceptions impact learning and conceptual understanding of biology, and 2) assess and evaluate how pedagogical techniques help students develop both expertise in problem solving and an expert-like appreciation of the nature of biology.

[1]  M. Klymkowsky,et al.  Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: what biologists can learn from physicists. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[2]  J. S. Tanaka,et al.  Factor analytic approaches to personality item-level data. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[3]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  AIP Conference Proceedings: Correlating Student Beliefs With Student Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey , 2005 .

[4]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Modifying and Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Use in Chemistry , 2008 .

[5]  Jennifer K. Knight,et al.  Different but Equal? How Nonmajors and Majors Approach and Learn Genetics , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[6]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[7]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Transforming undergraduate biology education for all students: an action plan for the twenty-first century. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Division on Earth BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[9]  Christine L. Moskalik,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Genetics Literacy Assessment Instrument for Undergraduates , 2008, Genetics.

[10]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[11]  C. Hansel Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[12]  Wendy K. Adams,et al.  Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking , 2011 .

[13]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Students know what physicists believe, but they don’t agree: A study using the CLASS survey , 2008 .

[14]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Building, using, and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: report on a National Science Foundation sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[15]  Jennifer K Knight,et al.  The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  G. Norman,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection , 2002 .

[17]  Jennifer K. Knight,et al.  Biology concept assessment tools: design and use , 2010 .

[18]  Andrew Elby Helping physics students learn how to learn , 2001 .

[19]  Quentin Vicens,et al.  A Diagnostic Assessment for Introductory Molecular and Cell Biology , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  Eric Brewe,et al.  Modeling instruction: Positive attitudinal shifts in introductory physics measured with CLASS , 2009 .

[21]  Marina Milner-Bolotin,et al.  The effect of interactive lecture experiments on student academic achievement and attitudes towards physics , 2009 .

[22]  J. Daniel House Student Motivation and Achievement in College Chemistry. , 1994 .

[23]  D. Eignor The standards for educational and psychological testing. , 2013 .

[24]  W. Wood,et al.  Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[25]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[26]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  Student expectations in introductory physics , 1998 .

[27]  J. Daniel House,et al.  Student Motivation, Previous Instructional Experience, and Prior Achievement as Predictors of Performance in College Mathematics. , 1995 .

[28]  V. Otero,et al.  Attitudinal Gains across Multiple Universities Using the Physics and Everyday Thinking Curriculum. , 2008 .

[29]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[30]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  New Instrument for Measuring Student Beliefs about Physics and Learning Physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. , 2006 .

[31]  David Hammer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics , 1994 .

[32]  Characterizing the epistemological development of physics majors , 2009 .