The Effects of the Structure of Play Objects on the Pretend Play of Low-Income Preschool Children

McLoYD, VONNIE C. The Effects of the Structure of Play Objects on the Pretend Play of LowIncome Preschool Children. CHriLD DEVELOPMENT, 1983, 54, 626-635. The effects of highstructure versus low-structure objects on various types and components of pretend play in a sample of 36 low-income, predominantly Afro-American preschoolers were examined. Competing hypotheses, derived from the work of Piaget and El'Konin, and claims about the relative holding power of low-structure and high-structure toys, were tested. 12 triads of children, equally divided by age and sex, were observed in 4 30-min play sessions. In 2 of the sessions, high-structure or replica objects (e.g., tea sets, dolls, trucks) were available; in the remaining 2, low-structure objects (e.g., pipe cleaners, blocks, boxes) were provided. The results were generally consistent with El'Konin's analysis of symbolic play development. Highstructure objects, compared with low-structure objects, significantly increased noninteractive pretend play in 312-year-old triads, but not in 5-year-old triads. High-structure objects also elicited significantly more associative pretend play and overall pretend play. However, the structure of the play objects did not significantly affect cooperative pretend play. Substitution was more frequent with low-structure objects, while high-structure objects were associated with more pretend themes and onomatopoeia.

[1]  R. McConkey,et al.  An observation scheme for recording children's imaginative doll play. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[2]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Free-Play Behaviors in Preschool and Kindergarten Children. , 1978 .

[3]  James E. Johnson,et al.  Developmental Trends in Preschool Play as a Function of Classroom Program and Child Gender. , 1981 .

[4]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Free Play Behaviors in Middle- and Lower-Class Preschoolers: Parten and Piaget Revisited , 1976 .

[5]  V. McLoyd.  Social class differences in sociodramatic play: A critical review , 1982 .

[6]  J. Ungerer,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Representation of Objects in Symbolic Play from 18 to 34 Months of Age. , 1981 .

[7]  D. El'konin.  Symbolics and its Functions in the Play of Children , 1966 .

[8]  Lilian G. Katz,et al.  Current topics in early childhood education , 1977 .

[9]  G. P. Stone.  The Play Of Little Children , 1965 .

[10]  M. Pulaski.  PLAY AS A FUNCTION OF TOY STRUCTURE AND FANTASY PREDISPOSITION , 1970 .

[11]  K. Lewin.  Environmental forces in child behavior and development. , 1931 .

[12]  R. E. Herron,et al.  Child's Play , 1971 .

[13]  Sara Smilansky,et al.  The Effects Of Sociodramatic Play On Disadvantaged Preschool Children , 1968 .

[14]  Ruth Phillips.  DOLL PLAY AS A FUNCTION OF THE REALISM OF THE MATERIALS AND THE LENGTH OF THE EXPERIMENTAL SESSION1 , 1945 .

[15]  Greta G. Fein,et al.  Sociodramatic play: Social class effects in integrated preschool classrooms☆ , 1981 .

[16]  Carl Murchison.  A handbook of child psychology , 1931 .

[17]  C. Garvey.  Some Properties of Social Play. , 1974 .

[18]  J. Singer.  Daydreaming : an introduction to the experimental study of inner experience , 1966 .

[19]  E. B. Hurlock.  Experimental investigations of childhood play. , 1934 .

[20]  V. Mcloyd,et al.  Verbally expressed modes of transformation in the fantasy play of Black preschool children. , 1980 .

[21]  L. Harper,et al.  Free-Play Fantasy Behavior in Preschool children: Relations among Gender, age, Season, and Location , 1976 .

[22]  K. Fuson,et al.  Verbally expressed fantasy play of preschoolers as a function of toy structure. , 1982 .