Bipartite flock control of multi-agent systems

This paper addresses the bipartite flock control problem with or without a virtual leader. Using structurally balanced signed graph theory and LaSalle's invariance principle, we prove that the algorithm guarantees a bipartite flocking behavior. In such a collective motion, the whole group separates into two clusters, in each of which all individuals move with the same direction. Meanwhile, every pair of agents in different clusters moves with opposite directions. Moreover, all agents in the two separated clusters approach a common velocity magnitude, and collision avoidance among each cluster is ensured as well. Finally, the proposed bipartite flock control method are examined by numerical simulations. The bipartite flocking motion addressed by this paper has its references in both natural collective motions and human group behaviors such as predator-prey and panic escaping scenarios.

[1]  Long Wang,et al.  Virtual Leader Approach to Coordinated Control of Multiple Mobile Agents with Asymmetric Interactions , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Wei Ren,et al.  Distributed coordination architecture for multi-robot formation control , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Psychological Review , 2003 .

[5]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Distributed Coordination Control of Multiagent Systems While Preserving Connectedness , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Thomas Zaslavsky Signed graphs: To: T. Zaslausky, Discrete Appl. Math 4 (1982) 47-74 , 1983, Discret. Appl. Math..

[7]  Xiao Fan Wang,et al.  Flocking of Multi-Agents With a Virtual Leader , 2009, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[8]  Xiao Fan Wang,et al.  Rendezvous of multiple mobile agents with preserved network connectivity , 2010, Syst. Control. Lett..

[9]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  S.-H. Lee,et al.  Predator's attack-induced phase-like transition in prey flock , 2006 .

[11]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Flocking in Fixed and Switching Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[13]  Ella M. Atkins,et al.  Distributed multi‐vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange , 2007 .

[14]  Chao Zhai,et al.  A General Alignment Repulsion Algorithm for Flocking of Multi-Agent Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  I. Couzin,et al.  “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Frank Harary,et al.  A matrix criterion for structural balance , 1960 .

[18]  Thomas Zaslavsky Signed graphs , 1982, Discret. Appl. Math..

[19]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[21]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[22]  T Kambara,et al.  Behavior pattern (innate action) of individuals in fish schools generating efficient collective evasion from predation. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Jiangping Hu,et al.  Tracking control for multi-agent consensus with an active leader and variable topology , 2006, Autom..

[24]  B. Crowther,et al.  Flocking of autonomous unmanned air vehicles , 2003, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).