How Does Self-Pollination Evolve? Inferences from Floral Ecology and Molecular Genetic Variation

The automatic selection and reproductive assurance hypotheses provide the two most general explanations for the evolution of self-pollination. Under automatic selection, self-pollination is mediated by pollen vectors and the mating system modifier experiences a transmission bias through the pollen that leads to its selection. Under reproductive assurance, self-pollination is autonomous and the mating system modifier is selected as it allows seed production when pollinators are scarce. We present phenotypic selection models that examine the selection of floral traits influencing several modes of selling simultaneously. Inferences from these models suggest that reproductive assurance may be more important than has been appreciated. Additional insight into the importance of automatic selection versus reproductive assurance may be gained by considering the distribution of neutral genetic diversity among populations within selfing species. A number of approaches are outlined for analysing patterns of neutral diversity as they pertain to the mechanism of the evolution of selfing.

[1]  B. Milligan Estimating long-term mating systems using DNA sequences. , 1996, Genetics.

[2]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[3]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. II. The Selection of Self- Fertilization , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[4]  M. Slatkin,et al.  Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. , 1991, Genetics.

[5]  K. Holsinger Mass-Action Models of Plant Mating Systems: The Evolutionary Stability of Mixed Mating Systems , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[6]  A. Brown,et al.  Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  F. Tajima The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. , 1989, Genetics.

[8]  E. Pollak,et al.  On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. , 1988, Genetics.

[9]  M. Feldman,et al.  The Evolution of Self-Fertilization in Plants: A Population Genetic Model , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[10]  F. Tajima Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. , 1983, Genetics.

[11]  P. Hedrick Hitchhiking: a comparison of linkage and partial selfing. , 1980, Genetics.

[12]  C. Strobeck Partial selfing and linkage: the effect of a heterotic locus on a neutral locus. , 1979, Genetics.

[13]  H. Wells SELF‐FERTILIZATION: ADVANTAGEOUS OR DELETERIOUS? , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Some Reproductive Factors Affecting the Selection of Self-Fertilization in Plants , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[15]  S. K. Jain,et al.  The Evolution of Inbreeding in Plants , 1976 .

[16]  T. Nagylaki A model for the evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  G. A. Watterson On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. , 1975, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  M. Nei,et al.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom , 1972 .

[20]  W. Ewens The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[22]  H. G. Baker,et al.  SELF‐COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER ‘“LONG‐DISTANCE” DISPERSAL , 1955 .

[23]  J. Gillespie The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[24]  R. Hudson Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. , 1990 .

[25]  B. Weir,et al.  Allozyme diversity in plant species. , 1990 .

[26]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  AVERAGE EXCESS AND AVERAGE EFFECT OF A GENE SUBSTITUTION , 1941 .