Fabrication of half-pitch 32-45-nm SRAM patterns with EUVL

Since the k1 factor is much larger in extreme-ultraviolet lithography (EUVL) than in optical lithography, optical proximity correction (OPC) should be much simpler for patterns on EUVL masks than for those on advanced photomasks. This will facilitate the fabrication of complex device patterns with EUVL. In this study, static random-access memory (SRAM) cell patterns for the half-pitch (hp) 32- and 45-nm nodes were fabricated using two EUV exposure tools (SFET, EUV1), and their fidelity was evaluated. The levels of SRAM patterns were isolation, gate, contact, and metal. The size of the SRAM unit cell was 0.191 μm2 for the hp 45-nm and 0.097 μm2 for the hp 32-nm patterns. Most of the experiments employed SSR2, a high-resolution EUV resist. The high performance of the SFET and SSR2 enabled hp 45-nm SRAM patterns to be fabricated faithfully. However, some of the hp 32-nm patterns deviated from the mask patterns. To determine the causes of this degradation, we made a simulation analysis using the Sentaurus Lithography simulator. The main cause of the degradation was found to be resist blur. When we used MET-2D resist, which has a relatively large resist blur, the degradation became quite severe. Although the resist blur for SSR2 is about 10 nm, it is not small enough for the hp 32-nm SRAM patterns, especially for the gate and metal levels. It is necessary to reduce resist blur to improve the fidelity for this pattern size. Simulation results indicated that resist blur should be reduced to about 5 nm for hp 22-nm node device patterns.

[1]  Hideki Morishima,et al.  Path to the HVM in EUVL through the development and evaluation of the SFET , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Koji Kaneyama,et al.  Current benchmarking results of EUV resist at Selete , 2008, Lithography Asia.

[3]  Hiroyuki Kondo,et al.  Development status of projection optics and illumination optics for EUV1 , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Yuusuke Tanaka,et al.  Estimation of diffusion lengths of acid and quencher in chemically amplified resist on the basis of extreme ultraviolet exposure results , 2007 .

[5]  Yuusuke Tanaka,et al.  Fidelity of rectangular patterns printed with 0.3-NA MET optics , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Hajime Aoyama,et al.  Flare evaluation for 32-nm half pitch using SFET , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Takao Taguchi,et al.  Selete's EUV program: progress and challenges , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Kazuaki Suzuki,et al.  Nikon EUVL development progress update , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Kazuo Tawarayama,et al.  Effects of aberration and flare on lithographic performance of SFET , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Kazuo Tawarayama,et al.  Evaluation result of Selete's exposure tool: impact of the source performance , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Yuusuke Tanaka,et al.  Evaluation of pattern fidelity in EUVL using a high-numerical-aperture small-field EUV exposure tool (HiNA) , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Naosuke Nishimura,et al.  Study of system performance in SFET , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.